Best Of

This one is hard to dissect.
Putting important things like the price and consequences of this "pipeline" aside, what exactly is so bad about it?
If we take away tech issues like hallucinations and broken sharpness filter, because those can be fixed eventually, would it make any difference?
If you pretend for a second that it was not made with AI, would it improve the perceived quality of the work?
Is it all look so weird because of technology or director's vision?

Those of his movies I watched looked good, though, must admit, simply not to my taste. Still, they had certain "charm" and it seemed to be centered on the characters/actors who carry the work with emotional performance. This doesn't have any anchor, any pull. Just people talking and stuff happening.

This gives me the same impression as any other AI videos so far: like the prompter was so impressed with sheer tech capabilities, they forgot to put effort into the movie as a whole. And if they really made an effort and think this was good enough, then I have to question their taste as experienced professional.
If this was supposed to be proof-of-concept, I'm not sure what it proves. The tech is impressive, but everything else is not. Is it the fault of the "tool" or the artist? Would it be better if someone else made it?

Naturally it's just an opinion of a mere consumer: my dislike may be simply a matter of taste in movies and heavy bias against questionable tool.
Still, if this is the future, than I'd rather stick with those who are going to be "left behind".