Home General Discussion

Computer upgrade time! SSD advice?

Joseph Silverman
polycounter lvl 17
Offline / Send Message
Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
Hey guys! I'm spending my meagre tax return on upgrading my computer this year. I know there's a ton of good knowledge here on polycount, so I thought i'd ask around before I started buying parts. I have an approximately 700$ budget. My primary goal is chewing through gigantic canvases in photoshop like they're nothing. My secondary goal is games, I guess.
I'm most interested in buying:
  1. Win7 for a 64bit os
  2. Solid State hard drive to run my os, photoshop and maybe steam off of
  3. Maybe a bit more ram
  4. If i can afford it, a decent monitor!
  5. If POSSIBLE, a processor upgrade
  6. if POSSIBLE, an affordable videocard upgrade.
My current setup is:
  • Processor: Amd Athlon x2 4200+ 64bit
  • MotherBoard: ASUS A8M2N-LA NODUSM3 1.05 (?) A8M2N-LA
  • Memory: 3gb ddr2 (1x 1gb, 1x 1gb sticks)
  • Video: Nvidia Geforce GT 240

Any advice? I'm primarily seeking input about the SSD, I don't know much about them.

Replies

  • MikeF
    Offline / Send Message
    MikeF polycounter lvl 20
    I just recently built a new system and this was my first time using a SSD
    i've currently got all my my apps and os installed since the drive is only 60gb, then i've got a larger hd for storage and games. Honestly if you can hold out a bit longer i think you'l see massive savings on larger SSD's, I bought the 60gb back in november for 120, now i'm seeing double the size for the same price
  • EarthQuake
    SSD+Win7 will add a nice noticeable difference to the overall "snappiness" of your system, I did that with my Intel Q6600/8gb system(was using xp 64 previously)

    Upgrading to 8GB is a good idea too, esp if you're going to win7 64 bit. I would do SSD+Win7+new ram as a "quick fix" but you're still going to be looking at a major upgrade soon.


    I would not recommend upgrading your CPU with that motherboard, you'll pay too much for virtually no gain, you're much better off putting that money into new CPU/Mobo/Ram. Your 4200+ is a seriously old and slow CPU, and your motherboard limits you to slim options. The best you could do is gain about 10% by buying an AMD 5000+ which is ~$100 on ebay.

    A much better idea would be to get something like the $200 Intel I5, a $75-100-ish motherboard, and 8GB of ram for $40. The I5 2500 is roughly 6x faster than your current CPU. Even a cheap $120 I3-2120 would be a significant upgrade at ~4x faster(I have a similar i3 in my laptop that is crazy fast).

    So lets say:

    Intel I5 2500 $200
    Basic Intel 1155 motherboard $75
    8gb(2x4) DDR3 1333mhz ram $40
    120gb SSD $150
    Win7 pro 64 bit OEM "system builder" edition $140

    That puts you at $575, with $125 left over to buy a new video card(240gt ewwww) or to put towards a monitor like a dell 23" e-IPS $2-300.

    In general, you're going to see a much bigger boost by getting a recent CPU than with an SSD. So that should be #1 on your list.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    You're the man eq, thanks a ton.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Recommendation on motherboard? All of the ones I'm seeing for low prices are micro atx -- would having a tiny motherboard be a problem?

    [ame="http://www.amazon.com/ECS-Socket-Intel-Motherboard-H61H2-M3/dp/B004VREPL8/ref=sr_1_36?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1328390978&sr=1-36"]Amazon.com: ECS Socket 1155/ Intel H61/ DDR3/ A&GbE/ MATX Motherboard, H61H2-M3: Computers & Accessories[/ame] Anything glaringly wrong with this?
  • Rwolf
    Offline / Send Message
    Rwolf polycounter lvl 18
    my Cosair force GT SSD has been running alright 60 gig is just enough for win7 and my tools. ($100 at boxing day)
    replaced my failed WD Caviar black...

    as for mobo's I usually just go w/ the cheaper ASUS boards. only one steered me wrong, and that was 6 years ago. (I would just make sure it supports enough ram that I plan on using)
  • Saman
    Offline / Send Message
    Saman polycounter lvl 14
    Rwolf wrote: »
    my Cosair force GT SSD has been running alright 60 gig is just enough for win7 and my tools. ($100 at boxing day)
    replaced my failed WD Caviar black...

    as for mobo's I usually just go w/ the cheaper ASUS boards. only one steered me wrong, and that was 6 years ago. (I would just make sure it supports enough ram that I plan on using)

    I use a 120gb HD and I sometimes go out of disk space. With 60gb you will go out of disk space very quickly if you plan on using large images in photoshop and install many programs. I keep my games on a different hard drive though.
  • Artist_in_a_box
    Offline / Send Message
    Artist_in_a_box polycounter lvl 7
    http://www.scan.co.uk/

    These guys where great for me. Their overclocked bundles are absolutely awesome.

    I think the best bang for buck mother board at the moment is the Asrock Z68 Extreme 7 gen 3, though i am far from knowledgeable in this area. I am just going off what info i find online and what they sell for.

    Also regarding the SSD. They are mega expensive at the moment, I went for a 120gb OCZ Sata 3 it cost me around 125 quid including delivery. That was the cheapest I could find at the moment.
    Although it was expensive the performance boost is amazing, my machine turns on and powers down now in under 7 seconds, programs open almost instantly. As long as you keep tabs on what you save on this drive and keep some larger HDD drives for main storage an SSD is probably the best system upgrade atm other than a video card.
  • MikeF
    Offline / Send Message
    MikeF polycounter lvl 20
    just out of curiosity, has anyone tried a hybrid drive?
    the main appeal of the ssd for me was speed and no moving parts, but these hybrids are really cheap.
  • Artist_in_a_box
    Offline / Send Message
    Artist_in_a_box polycounter lvl 7
    Not tried them personally but when I was researching what to buy they where mentioned a few times as a cheaper albeit less efficient option to SSD's. No one ever said they where bad or anything at all but you get what you pay for I would imagine. If you can afford an SSD get one, if not these are still a step up from HDD. Not sure how they fare regarding wear and tear tho.
  • 2cat
    Offline / Send Message
    2cat polycounter lvl 5
    Advice from a stranger:

    Dont get any SSD with a sandforce controller right now. Bound to give you trouble and BSODs.
  • m4dcow
    Offline / Send Message
    m4dcow interpolator
    2cat wrote: »
    Advice from a stranger:

    Dont get any SSD with a sandforce controller right now. Bound to give you trouble and BSODs.

    I don't know about that, I'm doing fine with my vertex 3. There was some firmware issue when they just came out but I got mine after all of that was resolved.

    The Crucial M4s recently had a firmware fix for some issues they had been having.

    The newer gen intels haven't had any issues I know of besides not really being able to surpass speeds of previous gen drives.

    Bar none sandforce 2XXX controllers are the fastest out there now, I know people have issues with OCZ support and quality control, but there are plenty of other ssd makers worth looking at that use sandforce controllers and offer good support for them.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Bought my parts. Will update when i get them -- thanks a bunch guys. :)

    Ended up with about 100 left over, saving up for monitors/video card.
  • GarageBay9
    Offline / Send Message
    GarageBay9 polycounter lvl 13
    I do believe it was Vig - er, Mark Dygert - who told me "if you were my daughter, and a Gypsy had the last SSD in existence, your new name would be Tzipporah."

    I dumped more money into the SSD in my new rig when I got it in March than I did into RAM. I can add more RAM later... the SSD is worth its weight in gold.
  • EarthQuake
    Bought my parts. Will update when i get them -- thanks a bunch guys. :)

    Ended up with about 100 left over, saving up for monitors/video card.

    Cool, what did you end up getting?

    In response to your previous Q about micro-ATX: IMO, MATX is great, we're long removed from the days when we needed lots of expansion ports for audio, ethernet, wifi, extra usbs, etc etc, this stuff all comes standard with a micro-atx board, hell many even support SLI.

    The two biggest things you need to watch out for with MATX boards are:
    1. Does it support enough ram?
    2. Will your video card block your sata ports?

    MATX allows you to have a more reasonable computer case too, you don't need one of those server-sized full towers that have slots for 12 drive bays.
    GarageBay9 wrote: »
    I dumped more money into the SSD in my new rig when I got it in March than I did into RAM. I can add more RAM later... the SSD is worth its weight in gold.

    Hehe, I would hope so, ram is dirt cheap!

    While SSD's are still expensive when you look at dollar:gb, the cost of SSDs is constantly going down, and the recent flooding in Thailand ran standard HDD cost through the roof.

    The last time I looked at a HDDs newegg was selling 1TB drives for $200 and 320gb for $100! About 6 months ago I bought a 1TB drive for $60!!! So yeah, the cost difference isn't so bad these days when we consider the performance of SSDs. That was about a month ago when I was doing a build for a family member, it seems the prices have stabilized a bit, but are still higher than they were.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    [php][/php]Ended up getting the ASUS P8H67-M mobo, 4gb x2 Corsair ram, Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 120 GB SSD, Intel Core i5-2500, and Windows! Surely not the best setup, but all reasonably decent values from the looks of it.

    I was highly tempted to -- and still might -- double the ram, but ram's cheap and money's tight, I can always buy it later. Since i do 99% 2d art and never for print or anything I don't think i'm gonna use all 8 gigs very often. We'll see! Probably should save up for monitors or a graphics card instead.
  • Dylan Brady
    Offline / Send Message
    Dylan Brady polycounter lvl 9
    I bought a 30Gig SSD a couple of years ago when they were like the newest thing. and you couldn't even find anything over 60gigs (paid like above $150 for mine back then)

    Lately I am having SERIOUS Issues keeping space open on this drive.

    - Windows Updates/Service packs keep filling up space.... so ill clear my temp folder-empty the recycle bin all that jazz and then not two second later I have LITERALLY 0 Kb of free space and I can't even run any programs at that point because there's no cache space.

    even though all my programs are installed on a slave drive - Windows 7 still puts large files onto the main windows drive through the ProgramData and App Data folders
    (I've had to simply delete some things out of there to get enough space to use my computer and I think I've corrupted my install of AVG in the process)

    soo... I'm sure with 120Gigs you wont run into these problems AS soon... but the potential is there they will become an issue eventually.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    I'm gonna keep my old hd to store most of my junk on. Just stuff I actually need the read/write speed for will go on my ssd.
  • Dylan Brady
    Offline / Send Message
    Dylan Brady polycounter lvl 9
    What im talking about though is no matter where you install programs - windows will put things into the C\Users\YOURNAME\AppData\Local and C\ProgramData that are needed for the programs to run. I've looked into moving where this folder is stored and it seems to be unstable and not advised by most people... so in that way you are limited with how many programs you can install on ANY drive.
    Files like movies/music/projects are no problem to keep elsewhere and mind you 120 is 4x what I have so I might just be overemphasizing the issue
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    ohh, yeah, i dig. Good advice! The biggest hd ive ever had was a 160gig -- i'm from the stone age -- so unless i get drunk with power i'll be okay!
  • EarthQuake
    Just FYI: I've got a 120gb SDD, and its plenty for os/apps/temp shit/working art files that you want to load quickly. Just make sure you're moving your big art files off to a different drive when you're done with them.
  • slipsius
    Since upgrading to ssd's, ive had a LOT of BSOD and random freezing. and yes, i turned off all the stuff i was suppose to.

    I had a 60gig OCZ agility 3 for windows and maya and stuff, and a 120 gig for games. on the weekend, i noticed my windows one was near full, same with the games, so i reformatted the 120gig, took out the 60 gig, installed all my main programs on the 120, and picked up a 2TB hhd for my games. Since then, the only issues ive had was firefox freezes ALOT. like, to the point wher ei cant even ctrl alt delete to close it. i can still click on the start menu and all that. So i ditched firefox and havent had issues since. its only been a day though. so who knows. My buddy had lots of issues with firefox as well when he got new mobo, as well.

    i dunno. for a new computer, too many issues.
  • Justin Meisse
    Offline / Send Message
    Justin Meisse polycounter lvl 19
    EarthQuake wrote: »
    Just FYI: I've got a 120gb SDD, and its plenty for os/apps/temp shit/working art files that you want to load quickly. Just make sure you're moving your big art files off to a different drive when you're done with them.

    QFT
    I have an 80gb SSD and it's always almost filled to capacity - I really need 40 more gigs. I'm probably going to upgrade to a 120, keep my 80 as work drive and get a TB drive when the price for disc drives go down.
  • ambershee
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    ohh, yeah, i dig. Good advice! The biggest hd ive ever had was a 160gig -- i'm from the stone age -- so unless i get drunk with power i'll be okay!

    0_0 - how do you manage!? Every time I upgrade, I end up picking up at least double the storage space of my previous machine (because my previous machines drives were reaching capacity).

    Every time I end up almost filling it within around 18 months. I'm currently running 1.5Tb, but still have over 900Gb filled. Do you store things like your libraries on external disks or something?
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    ambershee wrote: »
    0_0 - how do you manage!? Every time I upgrade, I end up picking up at least double the storage space of my previous machine (because my previous machines drives were reaching capacity).

    Every time I end up almost filling it within around 18 months. I'm currently running 1.5Tb, but still have over 900Gb filled. Do you store things like your libraries on external disks or something?

    I have just never had trouble with it. My disk hovers with 10-20 gb free at all times, and i uninstall games if i need more space.

    Save less HD porn!
  • ambershee
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    Everyone knows porn is for streaming!

    Some of the projects I have on my machine are larger than 60Gb, I don't get how you do it ;)


    ninja edit: whoops hit edit instead of quote
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    What kind of projects do you do? I draw pictures and make games with 256x256 textures! :p
  • ambershee
    Offline / Send Message
    ambershee polycounter lvl 17
    The projects in questions are in-development games - uncompressed asset packages with accompanying source files take up a lot of space :)
  • EarthQuake
    ambershee wrote: »
    Everyone knows porn is for streaming!

    Some of the projects I have on my machine are larger than 60Gb, I don't get how you do it ;)

    Its simple, while working on X psd or Z mudbox file, keep those assets on SSD. When asset is finished/approved, move into "project" folder.

    This can get messy if you need everything within a folder structure, but even then you can simply export your game-res assets to that folder structure.

    A ssd probably isn't a big deal for loading up tga files, but if you've got hundred MB+ psds/sculpts/etc it can make a difference.
  • Dylan Brady
    Offline / Send Message
    Dylan Brady polycounter lvl 9
    ohh man...
    so funny story, I came back from a break this afternoon to nif my hard-drive crashing on windows load with a
    0xc000000e Info: The boot selection failed because a required device is inaccessible.

    after repairing/messing with BCD edit. I tried putting the drive into another computer to see if it would even read.
    couldn't get it to work and after putting it back into my computer it now will not even show up in bios.

    I think the I angered the HDD gods by talking smack on it. (also 2Cats comments probably had something to do with it)
    soooo, anyone feel like recommending a good replacement for roughly 150?
  • claydough
    Offline / Send Message
    claydough polycounter lvl 10
    As of today there is a new SSD IOP speed king released today by the king of SSD Quality.

    Costs more ( not much more ) than other 6Gb/s Sandforce SSD's but the intensively developed Cherryville firmware/drivers are an Intel exclusive. ( Intel pushed this release back a year?! to make sure all the bugs suffered by other manufacturers were all squashed supposedly! )

    However according to Anandtech...
    Intel will only reap the exclusive benefits of it's Sandforce partnership/development for a short period. Between discovering what cheaper drives will actually benefit and what technology develops now that Sandforce has been bought by LSI.
    I am going to wait to see what develops.
    Since the Thailand Flooding induced Hard Drive price increases...
    SSD adoption and SSD price drops appear steadily. And there is a lot of different exciting development going on like the Hybrid solutions. I have enough reliable crucials to wait fer the next big thing to release cheaper.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5508/intel-ssd-520-review-cherryville-brings-reliability-to-sandforce
    Still lacking a 6Gbps controller of their own and wanting to remain competitive with the rest of the market, Intel approached SandForce about building a drive based on the (at the time) unreleased SF-2281 controller. Roughly six months later, initial testing and validation began on the drive. That's right, around the time that OCZ was previewing the first Vertex 3 Pro, Intel was just beginning its extensive validation process.
    Codenamed Cherryville, Intel's SSD 520 would go through a full year of validation before Intel would sign off on the drive for release. In fact, it was some unresolved issues that cropped up during Intel's validation that pushed Cherryville back from the late 2011 release to today.
    _DSC8965sm.jpg
    Intel's strenuous validation will eventually make SandForce's drives better for everyone, but for now the Cherryville firmware remains exclusive. Intel wouldn't go on record with details of its arrangement with SandForce, but from what I've managed to piece together the Intel Cherryville firmware is exclusive for a limited period of time. That exclusivity agreement likely expires sometime after the SF-2281 is replaced by a 3rd generation controller. There are some loopholes that allow SandForce to port bug fixes to general partner firmware but the specific terms aren't public information. The important takeaway is anything fixed in Intel's firmware isn't necessarily going to be fixed in other SF-2281 based drives in the near term. This is an important distinction because although Cherryville performs very similarly to other SF-2281 drives, it should be more reliable.
    Until now, SandForce hasn't really had a partner large enough to really throw a ton of resources at drive validation. Now that SandForce is under the LSI umbrella things may change, but until then we finally have a well validated SF-2281 drive: the Intel SSD 520.
    _DSC8966sm.jpg
    I'm still curious to see if other bugs crop up but if Intel hasn't found anything else after twelve months of testing I'm willing to bet that either the SF-2281 is irreparably broken or the 520 is going to be a reliable SSD.
    I only have one data point where the 520 behaves better than other SF-2281 based drives, but that alone is a perfect example of what you pay for with Intel. This is exactly what we've been waiting for. If you want the absolute fastest SSD on the market today, the Intel SSD 520 is the only drive to get. If you're put off by the price, Samsung's SSD 830 is an excellent alternative.

    Another great Alternative...
    Alot of Crucial 6Gb/s fans would argue that Crucial's proprietary hardware/driver strategies are also incredibly reliable at a great price. Particularly if you are raiding anyway. For awhile the c300 appeared again at a cheap price but availability and price have left the m4 as the real option again.
    768801.jpg
    Crucial Technology 128GB m4 SSD 2.5" Solid State Drive 6Gb/s
    Price $164.95
    • free shipping (USA)
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?Q=&O=&A=details&is=REG&sku=768801

    http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-series-520-240gb-6gbps-ssd-review-round-1-intel-releases-amazing-sandforce-driven-ssd/
    INTEL SERIES 520 240GB SSD PCMARK VANTAGE RESULTS
    The Intel 520 pulled through PCMark Vantage HDD Suite Testing with a Total Point Score of 72659 and a transfer speed high of 419MB/s while testing in Windows Media Player. To say that this is an excellent score is a bit of an understatement as Intel easily unseated the long standing Vantage champion OCZ Vertex 3 MaxIOPS SSD by over 2000 points which borders on incredible. This Vantage result will display the individual test speeds a bit more clearly:
    520-Vantage.pngI was so shocked that I repeated our Vantage tests three times and then even went a step further by re-testing the Vertex 3 MaxIOPS, Kingston HyperX and Corsair Performance Pro SSDs to ensure their scores remained as tested originally which they did. After all, these SSDs are the best of the best in PCMark Vantage testing to date:
    Vantage-Chart.png


    FINAL THOUGHTS
    Just as we have seen in every SSD release before this, the Intel reputation alone will do wonders for sales of the 520, although their last minute delay in it’s release at Christmas for further validation will also play well in the minds of potential customers. Add to this the fact that the 520 is now the ‘King of Performance’, has an industry high five year warranty, is available in an array of capacities and it’s pricing will be such that the consumer will latch on to them regardless and Intel is guaranteed a winner with this SSD.
    Now stay tuned in the next few days for Round 2 of this review as we RAID test three Intel Series 520 SSDs in some of the best RAID equipment available to the consumer and enterprise today! This is going to be amazing!
    final-awards-021.png
    5 year warranty on an SSD? :-)


    http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=850&Itemid=60&limit=1&limitstart=10
    Intel seldom receives the praise it deserves for innovating technology for everyone else in the industry, especially the solid state storage market. Intel's 25nm NAND Flash components are used inside Intel SSDs first and foremost, but then they quickly find their way into the vast majority of competing storageproducts. Thanks to Intel, consumers win either way regardless of brand and build. In the case of a shrinking NAND Flash construction process, a denser die means lower material costs and higher per-unit storage capacity. More for less is the best way to win consumer support, and it's obvious Intel's formula has been working to its favor.
    Our performance rating considers how effective the Intel SSD 520 Series solidstatedrive performs in file transfer operations against competing storage solutions. For reference, 160-420GB models of the Intel SSD 520 Series are specified to produce 550 MB/s read speeds and 520 MB/s writes. In our storage benchmark tests, the 240GB Intel SSD 520 Series solid state drive (model SSDSC2CW240A3) performed at or above this speed, surpassing nearly every other SATA-based SSD we've benchmarked. Our test results demonstrated the Intel SSD 520 Series was good for delivering 559/528 MB/s peak read and writes speeds using ATTO Disk Benchmark SSD speed tests. Linear filetransfers with Everest Disk Benchmark produced 489/497 MB/s, which exceeds performance of the OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS Edition SSD.
    The Intel SSD 520 Series SSD sent to us for testing is advertised to deliver 80,000 maximum combined IOPS, although it's unclear which tools and configuration settings were used to produce this particular figure. Using Iometer operational performance tests configured to a queue depth of 32 outstanding I/O's per target, our benchmarks produced 83,117 combined IOPS performance and delivered the best SATA performance results to date. Iometer proved that the Intel SSD 520 Series could outperform every other SATA-based storageproduct currently on the market, including the premium OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS Edition SSD based on the SandForce SF2281 processor. In the 4K 32QD tests with AS-SSD and CrystalDiskMark, the Intel SSD 520 Series SSD again dominated the field, besting every 3.5" consumer drive ever made.

    They sound like they approve?


    • 60GB (SSDSC2CW060A3): $149 MSRP
    • 120GB (SSDSC2CW120A3): $229
    • 180GB (SSDSC2CW180A3): $369
    • 240GB (SSDSC2CW240A3): $509
    • 480GB (SSDSC2CW480A3): $999
  • Dylan Brady
    Offline / Send Message
    Dylan Brady polycounter lvl 9
    Thanks man, I picked up that Crucial M4. installing my programs now.
    First thing I noticed after installing windows was that it booted like... in literally One second.
    my old drive took as long/longer than with an old HDD
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Report: this is awesome!
  • Dazz3r
    Offline / Send Message
    Dazz3r polycounter lvl 12
    Because of this thread I went and read lots of reviews and have now ordered the M4 off amazon! I have had lots of probs with my home PC (4gb of ram, q6600, hd6950, and couple of old hdds) especially with HDD caching while using max and photoshop. Hopefully this will give me some improvement until my proper upgrade in April.
  • Computron
    Offline / Send Message
    Computron polycounter lvl 7
    Guys, any tweaks I should perform on my system after getting an SSD? been looking around and I hear you gotta turn off virtual memory and defragging, anything else I should know?

    Also, if you have installed an SSD, do 3d modeling apps like 3ds max or zbrush feel any snapier, not just cold starts, but actual use?
  • Dazz3r
    Offline / Send Message
    Dazz3r polycounter lvl 12
    It arrived yesterday, photoshop CS5 boots in about 2.5 seconds, Max is installing while im at work. So impressed and so pleased I read this topic :D
  • PaulP
    Offline / Send Message
    PaulP polycounter lvl 9
    I'm buying a new system soon, and I'm excited about getting an SSD. Although after reading this it sounds like they still have a few problems (my internet would be very sad without firefox). That bench test link seems interessting, I might have to upgrade from a Corsair Force Series 3 to one of those Intel 520 bad boys!
  • Joshflighter
    Offline / Send Message
    Joshflighter polycounter lvl 9
    I just went out and got the OCZ Vertex 3 and it is mind blowing awesome! :D

    Now I have to learn to conserve space. :(
  • MikeF
    Offline / Send Message
    MikeF polycounter lvl 20
    I just went out and got the OCZ Vertex 3 and it is mind blowing awesome! :D

    Now I have to learn to conserve space. :(

    i've got a 60g vertex 3 and the biggest space saving i've done was remove the hybernate mode (if your on win7) that saved me about 9gb, and also reducing my virtual memory if you have sufficient ram
  • Joshflighter
    Offline / Send Message
    Joshflighter polycounter lvl 9
    I'll try that, thank you very much. I have 24 gigs of ram, so it should be sufficient. :p

    Btw, I read some reviews and people are saying they got blue death screens and the SSD crashed after a few months (Vertex 3). Any word on this?

    Edit; looks like I might be exchanging the Vertex for a M4.
  • MikeF
    Offline / Send Message
    MikeF polycounter lvl 20
    i've been running mine since November without a single problem. love it
  • mLichy
    I keep getting tempted to get a SSD, but I keep ending up waiting. I just keep hearing about issues, and I'm waiting for prices to go down I guess. I think both things are alot better now than a year ago, but still might wait longer. Overall load times aren't killing me on my setup, but I'm sure SSD would be nice.
  • AlecMoody
    Offline / Send Message
    AlecMoody ngon master
    the Samsung 830 SSDs are reliable, fast, and cheaper than the new intel 520 drives. You need a chipset with native sata 6gb to take full advantage of any of the newer ssds (sandybridge). The marvel sata III controllers on the first gen I7 motherboards are not very good.
  • elGuapo
    Here is a cool little thing about SSD's. Basically, they are showing how much difference an SSD can make in rendering. In this example, it is against a 10,000 rpm hard drive and it can render an image almost 4 times as fast.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKKf9hxSNRY"]Side-by-Side CAD demo Intel SSD 520 vs. HDD - YouTube[/ame]

    I have the Intel SSD 320 series and I am happy with it.
  • eld
    Offline / Send Message
    eld polycounter lvl 18
    That's skewed by intel though, startup of program is logical, but what are they possibly rendering that they can't fit in the memory of a proper workstation?

    As long as the workstation isn't running out of memory it shouldn't have to use the hdd as a scratchdisk and thus saving the render can be done when it's finished as to not slow down the rendering process.
  • claydough
    Offline / Send Message
    claydough polycounter lvl 10
    AlecMoody wrote: »
    You need a chipset with native sata 6gb to take full advantage of any of the newer ssds (sandybridge). The marvel sata III controllers on the first gen I7 motherboards are not very good.

    Highpoint aggressively carves an affordability niche for those suffering first gen marvel x58 woe.

    The newest highpoint driver is now benching at many specifications at over 50% over the last affordable version!

    This cheap looking pcb costs only $160.
    Highpoint-Front-300x200.jpg

    Although I am a loon and will still go for the next gen cache optimized LSI $$$( lots of dizzying tech in the werks at their mad scientest labs ) The SSD Review guys seem to be having a lot of fun with big bench numbers on this cheap looking toy!
    Those results were just a taste of what was yet to come as we simply had to throw eight Crucial M4 256GB SATA 3 SSDs onto the RocketRAID for a true run. How does 3GB/s performance grab you for a start? Unbelievable? That’s what we thought as well but we did it!

    http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/highpoint-2720sgl-rocketraid-controller-review-amazing-3gbs-recorded-with-8-crucial-c400-ssds/

    With only three of the new intel 520s...
    they are getting 1.5GB/s :)!
    ENTER THE HIGHPOINT 2720 SGL RAIDCARD

    Timing could not have been better for this report as we were already in the midst of performance testing the HighPoint 2720SGL RAID card with its new firmware and it has shown some amazing results. Quite frankly, the results are off the charts
    http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-520-ssd-review-round-two-raid-testing-at-1-5gbs-with-highpoint-2720sgl-raid-controller/

    I don't think a year ago, I would have believed you could get that kind of speed unless you were using a $700 LSI/ARECA. Certainly not with 3 cards.

    The Highpoint does not have any cache optimization though ( beside what may be on the ssd itself ) Not sure under what circumstances that would effect those results.
    They reported no heat problems with the Highpoint.
    Putting aside the 3GB/s performance for just a second, lets head back a bit to our review of the very same HighPoint 2720SGL controller with the same SSDs and older firmware. The performance of the controller was much better than expected, however, it was something else that got our attention, this something being the popularity of the review with our readers. This was evident in not only the amount of comments on the article as well as forum pm’s received, but also in the high number of e-mails received with respect to the article.
    As a result, we made sure we had that ‘face to face’ with HighPoint at CES and were asked to test new drivers that they had for the RocketRAID, drivers that would bring about an incredible 50% performance increase! An offer like this was simply to good to pass up.
    M4-and-HighPoint.jpgSIMPLICITY, PRICE AND PERFORMANCE

    The long list of reasons why our first review garnered so much attention just doesn’t seem to end for HighPoint. To say that such an amazing performance was achievable at such a low price was an understatement at the RocketRAID coming in at a mere $160, a price that saw many an enthusiast looking very closely at this card. And then there was RAID 5 and RAID 6 configurable straight out of the box, this being an absolutely fantastic feature for many home users with large HDD arrays, specifically Windows Home Servers and FTP Servers.
    Add to this the ability to simply plug this card into systems with older chipsets and users now have a simple upgrade to SATA 3 functionality and the RocketRAID is now a product suited for mainstream users as well as enthusiasts.
  • claydough
    Offline / Send Message
    claydough polycounter lvl 10
    Following link is a nice comprehensize overview of the huge performance gain you get by buying the largest ssd capacity you can afford.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/m4-ssd-capacity-comparison,2957.html

    They come to the conclusion that 128 gigs represents a sweet spot for price concerns.
    When I chose 256 gig model over 128 gig crucial c300. There was a signifigant difference in speed. ( the article does mention newer scaling tech? )

    Anandtech has a nice web based ssd comparison tool for u to research models and sizes of interest.
    The following is a comparison of the aformentioned difference between Crucials 256 gb and 128 gb c300 models:
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/419?vs=381

    The tool is kept up to date with the newest models. The following shows the new intel 520 kicking the ass of my crucial c300 ( same 256 gb size @ 6Gb/s ):
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/419?vs=529

    Just fill in the models yer interested in using the dropdown menus.
Sign In or Register to comment.