It's no secret that game developers are overworked, underpaid and exploited. It should go without saying that what is happening at Activision Blizzard is absolutely discussting and I can't see a case for thinking otherwise. At first I thought the reason was that there were too many people who could replace experienced workers demanding better pay. But after reading through a few old threads it is very clear that this is not the case.
I figured someone would have asked this question before. And of course, they did.
https://polycount.com/discussion/216749/unionizeAccording to this poll, most people on this forum are pro union. Most people in the industry are artist. So that begs the question, what is stopping you!? After reading through the thread, people are saying that unions can not form for 3 reasons
1: A wide variety of skillsets
2: Corrupt union leaders
3: Companies leaving the country
I don't have any experience in the game industry, so I would like a bit more information on the first one? Why would a variety of skillsets prevent everyone from mutually benefitting.
I keep hearing people say the last 2, but no one has given any real life examples of this happening. According to the FEE (
https://fee.org/articles/the-corruption-of-union-leadership/ ) , the issue with unions is that not all the workers will agree with the unions decisions and it makes life harder for corporate and corporate will make less money because all the workers are now working less and making more. Isn't the WHOLE FLIPPIN POINT!? And I have NEVER heard of a corporation moving out of the country because of Unions. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. It's just that I have no basis for backing this claim.
I think the video game's industry's fear of unions is unfounded and the people who say the have personal experience with "bad" unions are either hopped up on too much pro corporate right wing news or people who SIMP for management at their own expense. Am I wrong? Can I have some real world examples of how you personally lost money or a time a union leader did not have your interest?
Replies
2. people without financial security can't take risk
Union doesn't solve every problem and creates new problems but I think anytime you make life harder for the psychopaths that's gonna be generally better for the majority who actually care about each other.
You might get fired which means you have to live from your savings or your partners income. If you have a mortgage on a house + you are paying for other things like your kids education etc and you really need your income you cant risk loosing your job.
basically the more noise there is about unions, the more likely it is going to happen. People who don't take risk as a root part of their personality are just never going to do that. People who go to work for big corporations aren't looking to grab the reins of responsibility and take bold risk. They just want to make art and leave all the rest of the bullshit to whoever else.
anyway, in general i think shaming can be a good thing, but it is better to do it to actual people in person. Somebody should go with a megaphone to the people having a walk out and ask them if they are just gonna go right back to work tomorrow. Ask them if they've really accomplished anything.
i dont know much about it, maybe they are doing more than that. It's good they are doing ssomething anyway.