Home Technical Talk

What makes this scene obviously miniatures?

grand marshal polycounter
Online / Send Message
Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
One look at this scene and you can tell it is miniatures. No question. But why is that? The lighting and texturing is quite realistic. Is it something to do with the scale? Or camera? Or simply the unrealistic cleanliness of the road and other surfaces?
httpss23527pcdncowp-contentuploads201611tilt_shift_minuature2jpgoptimaljpg

Replies

  • NikhilR
    Offline / Send Message
    NikhilR polycounter
    Its the camera, its called tilt shift,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk9EBOOAYiU
    process in the video description
  • Alex_J
    Online / Send Message
    Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
    Well, that was simple enough.

    It's fascinating. This image I referenced, i am not even sure if its real now or not. Probably real.

    Gonna see if I can mimic this in Unity somehow.
  • danr
    Offline / Send Message
    danr interpolator
    There’s a legacy image effect specifically for tilt shift style DOF, it’ll be in one if the old packages
  • Alex_J
    Online / Send Message
    Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
  • lefix
    Offline / Send Message
    lefix polycounter lvl 11
    I think the new Link's Awakening remake is sort of faking(?) this by simply blurring the top and bottom of the screen

  • Alex_J
    Online / Send Message
    Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
    @lefix , read the wikipedia for tilt/shift. It's pretty complex, a lot more than just depth of field. It kind of takes perspective away and gives that orthographic feel.


    edit:


    seems like the Unity legacy tilt-shift is indeed just a post process effect that deals with blurring. I suppose you need to use it in conjuction with an orthographic camera for full effect?

  • cptSwing
    Offline / Send Message
    cptSwing polycounter lvl 11
    lefix said:
    I think the new Link's Awakening remake is sort of faking(?) this by simply blurring the top and bottom of the screen

    Oooh, haven't seen that one. Lovely looking.
  • Prime8
    Offline / Send Message
    Prime8 interpolator
    Cameras which have a post processing effect for this usually use a blur filter and increase the saturation as well, to make it look more "toiy".
    The blur extends from a horizontal or vertical line or area and get stronger with distance.

    You don't need an orthographic camera for the full effect, high focal length maybe, but that's up to your taste.
  • Alex_J
    Online / Send Message
    Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
    thanks @Prime8

    Besides the legacy screen effect DanR mentioned, I heard one of the legacy post process stacks had a blur effect as part of the vignette filter, which could be used to kind of fake the effect to some degree as well.

    I've found some free and some cheap plugins for this effect that I'm gonna check out. Will post results if they're good.
  • EarthQuake
    @lefix , read the wikipedia for tilt/shift. It's pretty complex, a lot more than just depth of field. It kind of takes perspective away and gives that orthographic feel.



    There are two components to a tilt shift photography, and it's important to separate them and understand that they do entirely different things.



    The above image shows a tilt/shift lens with both tilt (rotation, the guide lines on the right) and shift (the guide lines on the left) engaged.

    What you're talking about in this thread is tilt. The lens is tilted off axis from the camera, which throws the plane of focus off axis. This allows you to do things like blur near and distant objects much more than you could with a traditional lens. You can also do the reverse and use it to focus on two objects which are not on the same plane, a technique commonly used in macro and product photography. Tilt doesn't alter the perspective of the image though.

    Perspective is controlled by the distance to the subject, and to a lesser extent the focal length or angle of view of the lens. The closer you are to an object, the more exaggerated the perspective gets, the further away, the more compressed. Think of a mountain ridge miles away, as you move around it doesn't change much. Now, go and look at yourself very close in a mirror, and notice how distorted you look from a few inches away. Then back out a few feet and pay attention to the change. Our eyes and cameras / lenses work the same.

    A camera's focal length (or FOV / angle of view) determines how wide the shot is. The wider the shot is, the more you can fit in the frame. The wider the shot, the closer you have to get to your subject to fill the frame. So, while it is really the distance to subject that controls perspective, the angle of view determines how close you need to be to frame the subject. In practice this means that for a given framing (let's say a headshot), the lens determines how close you need to stand, which determines perspective. So generally speaking, a photographer would choose a specific lens type if he wants to produce a specific style of perspective.

    For a good visual representation of how perspective can be altered, watch the following video on dolly zoom:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5JBlwlnJX0

    A dolly zoom is essentially a camera trick where you move the camera backward while zooming (changing the focal length) to keep the subject framed while compressing the perspective, or vice versa.

    Now, the second component of a tilt/shift lens is the shift part. This allows the lens to be moved on-axis in relation to the camera. This is commonly referred to as a "perspective control" lens, and is used primarily to control converging lines. The idea that this function controls the perspective itself (how exaggerated or compressed the perspective is) is a misnomer - again that's down to the distance to subject / focal length (Tilt-Shift lenses come in wide angle to telephoto focal lengths). Now, what this function does allow you to do is keep your camera level and parallel to your subject. For instance, if you were taking a photo of a large environment or building, and you're standing on the ground, you would generally need to point the camera upwards. Pointing up creates converging lines. Shifting on the other hand, mimics raising the camera to a higher vantage point, which allows you to get more of the shot in the frame without converging lines.

    These concepts are illustrated in this quick video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RGFz0tZFCc

    and more on shift:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV7YWn1_TZQ

    Generally speaking, there isn't a need to mimic shift lenses with 3D rendering, because you're not bound to physical spaces and can place your camera anywhere you want to.
  • Alex_J
    Online / Send Message
    Alex_J grand marshal polycounter
    Fantastic @EarthQuake .

    After reading the Wikipedia and some other stuff I think I was more confused than when I started, but you've cleared a lot up for me here. Great youtube videos as well -- seeing makes it a lot easier to understand.




  • EarthQuake
    perna said:
    i have been photographing for decades and i oppose @EarthQuake's absurdist claims on the grounds that they're nothing but froth and bullcock. I'm literally shaking my head. I wrote a long post carefully disseminating all the points but then my red hat server crashed. C'est la vie.
    Your mother is the afterbirth of a rotten snail! I spit on your misguided sentiments. S'il vous plaît enjou de boeuf au fromage.
Sign In or Register to comment.