hey guys, not sure if anyone posted this yet, but I came across another cloud storage solution that's pretty new but has some neat features, mainly the fact that when you do a lot of shared files, it splits the storage among how many people are sharing the file instead of it taking up the full space on everyone, which I find pretty nifty.
it's also pretty cool in that you get 15 gigs free to start +5 if you use a referral link (like mine har har:
https://copy.com?r=9OTK1M), and anyone you refer also gets an additional 5gb, with no cap currently. I figured this was a good chance to start a referral chain if anyone wants to use mine, then post their referral link and we can all help each other get free space.
I already use dropbox (and love it), but I only have 12 gigs there and like the idea of having a second cloud folder only for inspiration or reference, or a particular personal project.
anyway I apologize if this was already posted about but it seemed pretty neat to me
once again, if you're interested in signing up you should use this link to get an additional 5gb on your account
https://copy.com?r=9OTK1M
hope you guys are having a good holiday!
Replies
Thanks for this, my Dropbox is getting very cramped.
Here is my link - https://copy.com?r=f1mIwE
Some cloud services will give multiple users access to the same encrypted file if they all upload the same file to their account, which means you're not the only one that can decrypt your files and there's only one copy available. If the server that hosts that only copy gets hacked, seized, or damaged, everyone that shared that file loses access to it until they get the backups back. So, shared encryption keys? That doesn't sound very secure to me. There's also the whole Megaupload ordeal where thousands of customers lost vital data that was 100% theirs and were not sharing infringing files. The government won't be able to go after individuals and lose your data for you because it's no longer centralized in a big corporate data center.
PRO's:
-You control your hardware.
-Decentralized so government raids don't take away your legal data just to catch a handful of infringers.
-The capacity is dependent on how big and how many drives you use.
-You're the only one that can decrypt your data.
-You can use it as a media server at home and a cloud server when you're out.
-You don't need lots of local storage (Your phone can stream your videos and photos directly to your NAS and Tablet can stream movies from your NAS).
CON's:
-You're responsible for making backups (RAID might be a good idea).
-Your ISP might not have very good upstream service (Asymmetric speeds).
-Larger upfront cost (most home NAS boxes cost $150-$600).
-You might have to get a UPS (Unless you already have one with excess capacity).
Heres my link: https://copy.com?r=BcVYAX
You can use DDNS, which is free. I can't argue with the poor upstream. However, I don't trust cloud services. I trust them even less after they shut down Megaupload and lost everyone's personal data. Online cloud services are just too risky. So the logical conclusion would be to make your own backups on a NAS. And while you're at it, you might as well make it accessible online too.
The fact that most ISP's provide such weak upstream service is deplorable. They're trying to keep people dependent on services that make them money (e.g. phone, cable, radio) that we could provide for ourselves. For example, how popular is Spotify and Pandora? Very, right? Now what if you could stream your library from your cloud NAS to your smartphone (actually you can right now if you have at least 1Mbps)? They also don't want you running servers, but the line between server and client is a very blurry one. If you can run a server, you can provide services that would compete with theirs and we all know how much corporations hate competition, even if that competition is a free service.
Note that I say this as someone that's spending his entire Sunday learning how to set up rsync manually to connect five studios across four countries to sync all my game's art production because of a few problems other people haven't solved yet. :P
I haven't overlooked the fact that not everyone has the money, the knowledge, or patience. Though, the savings you would reap by not paying monthly for an ephemeral service does help cover the initial costs and avoids perpetual costs of subscriptions. If you can wait, it's worth it to save up and pursue that course. Products do exist that are virtually plug and play. They might not be the cheapest option, but there are NAS products for everybody that desires convenience and simplicity. The only glaring issue I can really sympathize with is poor upstream performance on residential internet services. I also sympathize with affordability. At the moment I can afford neither option.
Good luck with your project. Have you examined Own Cloud, Sea File, or Bittorrent Sync? I don't know your goals or needs, but one of those might help.
From purely a cost standpoint, Copy is $9.99\mo for 250gb of storage versus $150 to $600 one-time cost for the hardware. Not including time spent setting it up, troubleshooting, dealing with downtime and hardware failures, manually upgrading when necessary, and the increased cost of electricity for the additional hardware, cost of your internet connection if you have a bandwidth-metered plan or are in a heavily-trafficked area (I've had my internet service suspended for syncing to P4 remotely from home due to data usage) it would take 15 months to five years for setting up your own NAS to pay for itself.
And if you're sharing files with people or teams, that's a whole other can of worms. This is going to go beyond the scope of consumer-level usage, but having a robust solution for security, user accounts, different permissions settings, scheduling synchronization for colossal amounts of data that won't bring down a studio's bandwidth during business hours, access via browser or mobile device or tablet, incremental syncing to save bandwidth, selective syncing of folders, tech support for connectivity issues, and either direct or indirect (via tech support) control over which ports and protocols are used to circumnavigate weird IT permissions settings in multiple environments as well as country-wide firewalls are all important considerations for me. The kind of weird shit you run into in the wild is staggering.
Sorry if I seem soapboxy, this is just a subject I've been researching intensely for personal and business use for the last two years in general and last two months in particular, and apparently it's made me picky and opinionated devil's advocate. hahah. Not trying to bust your balls or anything, this is just almost all I've been thinking about lately.
Haven't tried Own Cloud or Sea File yet, but I will now. Rsync's kicking my ass today. Thanks man!
https://copy.com?r=Onla71
No problem, I'm glad it helped.
My link https://copy.com?r=2bNikJ
What money? Dropbox is free. Copy is free.
Neither of these are supposed to work as a backup solution or a mediaserver, btw. You can use them for that to a degree, sure, but then you indeed run into size limitations.
Seems like an awesome service.
Here's mine https://copy.com?r=gPwQdi
one more referral here:
https://copy.com?r=WKmSBm
I'm a massive fan of Dropbox, it's completely changed the way that I move files around. I can't remember the last time that I used a memory stick or CD. However, I'm running out of space and I don't want to have more. Copy.com came at the right time as I didnt want to use Sky Drive because it's too "embedded" in my Windows, and I don't like that.:). I do use less known exclusive cloud hoster for personal purposes - http://mozy.co.uk/product/mozy/personal.
My question is - what are your experiences with copy.com - is it near-Dbox in terms of quality and security?
I can't recommend this service enough.
Copy for us for at least the last year has been on par with Dropbox in terms of quality and security, if not better. Of course will all of the extra features and benefits that Copy provides, especially on the free level, it is always the cloud service I recommend. The free level is great too. While I have been looking for a reason to upgrade to a paid level, the free benefits have been so great that no one on my team has actually had a need to yet.
Used yours citizen:
Mine below~
https://copy.com?r=aYEDFz
Never going to complain about free 20gb storage. That's a instant backup of well 20gb of stuff would you believe!
Used your link Lazerus, cheers
heres mine
https://copy.com?r=jkicJt
used yours JohnnyRaptor
and my code.
https://copy.com?r=sIWpZz
Used yours mrawolf, cheers!
and my code.
https://copy.com?r=KMY40V
And if somebody doesn't have dropbox yet, here is this code. :poly136:
https://db.tt/6l7vHS8w
Because local NAS does not = backup?
You should have at least 2 local copies and 1 remote copy of anything you want to legitimately backup. A NAS is a good idea and it gets you that second local copy, but it doesn't protect against fire, flooding, theft, etc, if your backup is sitting a box next to your computer/in your basement/whatever.
Personally, I have multiple computers that backup to a local NAS which automatically backs up to an offsite cloud storage service. I would suggest anyone serious about backup to do the same. I can stand the loss of any two sources of content and still be ok.
edit: lol sorry for responding to a 2 year old post.
My fault for digging it up, but I figured she was still warm. :poly142:
Used your code, here is mine if anyone wants to pay it forward.
https://copy.com?r=nGBd1f
Thanks
https://copy.com?r=R9fPKK
Here's mine.
Thank you, I've been needing this for a project right now.