I can't wait to see it. Some reviews are saying its the best Bond movie yet. I'll be happy if it better than Quantum of Solace. I almost fell asleep watching that one.
The first Daniel Craig one (Casino Royale) was my favorite Bond movie, and actually the only Bond movie I liked. The second one wasn't that great. But this one looks real good again.
So yeah, I'm gonna check it out.
And that promotion is awesome. I think I would have made it, but I would have just slammed right into a lot of that. Like the guys with the glass window, or those two joggers.
Yeah I agree i loved casino royale but thought quantum solace was just ok. Hopefully this one gets back into the swing of things. Really looking forward to it!
quantum was a really slick looking film, the story was weak. casino and goldeneye are my 2 favorite bond films and funny thing is they both have the same director. really looking forward to this one, heard its awesome and sam mendez is a pretty solid director. the only thing that bugs me is how close cropped daniel craigs hair is, looks really military style, it looked better in casino. hahah thats pretty much my only gripe though.
Javier Bardem is gonna be amazing as the bad guy. I am so excited to see this movie. Hopefully it'll be the best one to date. The colors and the composition of the shots are super bold. I really like the cinematography. Plus, i just like Daniel Craig as 007. Q is coming back as well. I like that actor.
I've heard this is suppose to be the best bond film yet. Im really hoping that is true. As many others have said. Casino royale was fantastic. solace, not so much.
glottis, that is fucking cool. Beat the first one. dont have time to finish the rest. ill try again later.
Slip... i agree... solace was not that great... but i do think that casino royale is my favorite bond movie. It's right there with the pierce brosnan game that was its own story. That one was fantastic hehe I can't wait to see the movie.
I beat the first one as well... 2 tries to get the right approach. I like it so far. The second one seems more intense.
This movie is the first professional film/game/anything I ever worked on, and although I didn't have a big job to do with it, it's still very exciting for me So I cannot wait
(My name wont be in the credits, but the company I contract at should be.)
You do realize that Bond no longer drinks martinis, right? Heineken bought all alcohol rights so now Bond drinks Heineken beer. Hopefully he still gets it shaken, not stirred.
why's no-one talking about this? is there another thread?
just came from the cinema, loved it! soo much better than quantum, maybe that's partly why it comes off so well, but it's packed full of great imagery, locations, sets, and ideas. very satisfied with the movie. Javier rocks, just the right level of menace, creepiness and humour
there are a few holes you could pick at if you're so inclined, like
the game keeper's insistance on using a flashlight at the end, and M not saying a word about it (I guess she was probably in shock though)
however it was such a good ride I didn't care to look for problems
Yeah that was a bit weird when he used the flashlight, and how insanely bright it was (1,000,000,000 candle power!). But it would have been pitch black out there, and with rough terrain like icey lakes, moors, and marsh lands, maybe it was necessary.
on a slightly different topic, I think the theme tune is great and quite classically bond- what's up with the music video for it though? just some words spelling out the lyrics and some blurry smoke and stuff behind? seems quite lacklustre considering what it is
I thought it was awesome, one of my favourites. Definitely different as far as bond films go but that wasn't a negative at all. Did not see that ending coming either!
I have to say, it disappointed me. There was no depth to anything, it felt like to just touch on all sorts of tender issues and not really dig into anything. There were no twists, no surprises, no grander scheme. The villian's way of the death - as greatly acted as it was - was just shallow. I'd expect Bond to endure much more mental strain b4 winning. There could have been a sick triangle there between him, Bardem and M. But it just fell short.
Other thnigs:
- Moneypenny was hot
- No way he could bone the Asian by simply stepping into her shower
- Putting a towel on the shot-agent at the beginning was srs 'stablizing him' procedure
- Chase scene was a letdown
- When Bond was operating the fork-machine on the train, he got shot. The guy had the upper-ground, being armed, and Bond was helpless. Yet, when Bond steps out of the machine to the open, we see the guy left his winning position and was even taken by surprise when Bond came up behind him. Oh please.. too easy!
Casino Royal was fantastics. Le Chiffre posed a real mental challange to Bond, not only in the poker but also when he got captured & tortured. In Skyfall the same thing happened, the capturing, the girl and her being played as as a card by the villian, but it didn't seem to care to Bond. There was no depth to the relationships
I saw this last week and loved it, although there where som pretty silly plotholes!
Shotgun:
-yes!
-yeah, I thought the same
-That was the point, he couldn't stabilize the guy because M was ordering him on.
-the opening one? I loved it! Motorcross bikes over ancient turkish roofs!
-yeaahhh. Im glad they made the bullet wound a big thing, because it felt like a big deal that he got hit, but it probably should have happened later in that scene.
I think it had more depth than you give it credit for: (huge spoilers)
I see the movie as having two plots, one about the bad guy hacking systems and trying to kill M in person, and another about the relationship between M and bond.
I thought the main plot with the bad guy was entertaining, but so disjointed and full of holes it made no fucking sense. Like why he had such a roundabout way of capturing M if he was so capable and had so many inside men. But I never noticed this in the film, because there was the M/bond plot tying things together. Alot of the film is about Bond feeling betrayed by M but going back to help protect her. This is important because, as it is revealed, He couldn't 'protect' his parents at skyfall. Given that he joined the service at such a young age, M has become a mother figure to him, (I don't think they needed wossisname to be yelling MOTHER! at the end of the film like a psycho to hammer that one in. Bit dumb.) This is why he takes her to skyfall manor as well.
Still it was a bit contrived. the whole 'lets go to a remote location with no backup and invite the bad guys over' did not strike me as a sound plan at any point. wtf.
Just seen it today. Was Awesome! A lot better than quantum. Not sure if its beter than Casino, will have to watch it again.
Adele Music is alright, a bit more "Bond", but thats because its nearly exactly like Diamonds are forever!
Villian was really good.
Yeah. the torch at the end is a bit bright. and surely they wouldn't risk using it. or put your hand over it and dim it a bit.
kinda knew M would die about halfway through and I also knew Ralph would be stepping in. Something gave it away but, I knew.
Q........ the super intelligent, cocky as fuck kid, thinking he's the brainiest shit on the block..... plugs the villians (who we already know is a computer wiz) laptop into the entire network and not a secure "off the grid" system and thinks it'll be fine. Coz i'm the greatest ever...... "uh oh, we've been hacked".............. FIRED! go and empty your desk. Then go back to your old job acting on the IT crowd.
Yeah, plan to hole up in an empty castle was a bit silly as well
I'm a massive Bond fan, and I've been fortunate to work on a Bond film and game, so here's my take....no spoilers
Skyfall is a terrific Bond movie and Mendes has delivered a very good and well made movie. Roger Deakin's photography is excellent and the talents of Alexander Witt as 2nd Unit Dir, and Stuart Baird as Editor are also visible too.
Skyfall is certainly better than Quantum of Solace, but at the same time I don't believe QoS is that bad. It's just a different context. QoS looks kinda rushed and unfinished (you have to watch it directly after Royale for it to work. QoS is basically Casino Royale Pt2), whereas Skyfall seems to have a more crafted feel to it.
I think the reason for this is the gap between the films. Royale appeared 4 years after Brosnan bowed out on the poor Die Another Day (the franchises 40th anniversary), and immediately looked fresher. QoS was only 2 years after Royale and was lacking. Skyfall has come 4 years from QoS and it really shows. The longer gap (studio troubles aside) has really allowed the producers to spend more time on development. The script feels more snappy, well tuned and with better pacing. There's also been alot more previs produced as well, which really helps the set pieces.
The plot and story is wafer thin, and became predictable for me, but the film compensates that by presenting and delivering it well. Craig is good and feels more relaxed after his difficult second 'album' QoS. Dench is very good and though I haven't liked her that much recent movies, she's good here. It was good to see a little more of Rory Kinnear's character Tanner, he's a fine actor and I hoped he would be used more. Whishaw's debut of Q is understated but also well done. Fiennes, Harris and Finney, very good all round.
Which brings me to Javier Bardem.....is he a good actor - yes, is he a good villan - yes, is he the right villan for this Bond movie - I'm not sure. A good performance yes, slightly comedic and camp in places, but I didn't quite grasp the credibility of his background. Not when you look at Sean Beans character in Goldeneye or Carlyle in TWINE. I think those characters would of been a slightly better fit for Skyfall.
My only other minor gripe in turns of characters, was that it would of been good to of seen something of Jeffrey Wright's broody Felix Leiter (he was great in Royale and QoS).
Having heard alot of Adele's song, I initially thought that it was kinda ok, but nothing special, but it's definitely a grower and like all Bond songs, works better in the context. Thomas Newman's score is very good, it's snappy at times with touches of Bourne, but well done. John Barry said that if ever got himself into trouble you can always fall back on the Bond motif, and Newman also uses this at the right times.
Being the 50th anniversary of Bond, there's always expectations among fans of in-jokes and references to previous movies. Die Another Day tried the same, but at times they shoehorned too much. Skyfall has plenty, some obvious, some more cryptic but the balance is right.
Overall a very well made and accomplished Bond movie. I'm gonna hold back from the 'best Bond ever' tag, as I think its a term that gets waved too easily. You can't really compare Skyfall to the other movies, as with the Bonds they're about the era they're made. Royale and QoS were Bonds of the noughties, but Skyfall is definitely a Bond for 2010s.
Goldfinger was where all the pieces and formula that we have come to know from the Bond movies and franchise, finally came together to make the recipe. Skyfall does seem like the Goldfinger for the audience of today.
wow. very different than what I expected, but I still really liked it. felt really different than any other bond movie, he was a lot more human and looked so haggard for most of the movie. the cinematography was amazing, easily the best looking bond film. Overall I think I still like casino a bit better, its a bit more intense but this was fantastic. loooooved the aston martin
wow. very different than what I expected, but I still really liked it. felt really different than any other bond movie, he was a lot more human and looked so haggard for most of the movie. the cinematography was amazing, easily the best looking bond film. Overall I think I still like casino a bit better, its a bit more intense but this was fantastic. loooooved the aston martin
While I did think it was fantastic, one thing bothered me..
They make a point to say that Silva allowed himself to be caught, but what did Silva accomplish by allowing himself to be trapped in MI6? He had already hacked their network right? I don't remember hearing what hacking it a second time allowed, other than him to escape..
While I did think it was fantastic, one thing bothered me..
They make a point to say that Silva allowed himself to be caught, but what did Silva accomplish by allowing himself to be trapped in MI6? He had already hacked their network right? I don't remember hearing what hacking it a second time allowed, other than him to escape..
I think it was to get close to the London Underground in order to try and assassinate Q at the public inquiry.
it was a really good job they hacked the computer to release Silva during M's appearance at the enquiry
not really sure actually why he needed to go via underground, why not just sort of, sneak into London like the agent that he is. He did want a chance to talk to M one last time so that could be the actual motivation
Shanghai? Damn.. I wonder if they'll show this here then. There used to be a law that they can't show foreign movies featuring China in China. No wonder Looper didn't make it to the cinemas here. DAMMMMMMN! But flying to Hong Kong just to see a 007 movie.... hmmm?
On the torch thing, you have to remember that the grounds keeper was probably in shock too, he would usually use a torch at night so automatically used one when they were escaping?
Faaaairly sure that's been the point of Bond for all of it's 50 years. These aren't chicks he's gonna be taking home to mom. The relationships that mattered, showed.
The movie is worthwhile just for the bold colors, and cinematography. Sam Mendes really did a stunt with all his composition and really nice color palettes. The movie itself was kinda long. I liked the small reminders of what Bond used to be and the new Bond.
I have to say tho, that Javier Bardems character didn't quite make the memorable villain that i was hoping he was going to be.
BUT WATCH IT ON THE BIG SCREEN! so many colors, so pretty. I still stick with Casino Royale being the best one so far.
Faaaairly sure that's been the point of Bond for all of it's 50 years. These aren't chicks he's gonna be taking home to mom. The relationships that mattered, showed.
Doh
I mean the relationships between the characters, not the sex-relationships
When the villain showed his deformation and confronted 'mother' ... that was the end of that part. Could have been so much more!
When the Asian was put to 'trial' ... who cared?
Despite all of the villain's prowess, he died from a ... ? come on. There was no mental confrontation. He was just an obsessed goon. Considering Bardem's acting ability, it was a missed opportunity, IMO
Moneypenny's action at the beginning of the movie could have been played out where Bond would have been put to a similar test against her or something, I dunno. Everything was good, at its essence, just wasn't 'exploited' all the way
also, Moneypenny surely had enough training to take 2 or more shots at a target. why does she shoot bond, then just watch as the baddie gives her a thankful look. Ok, maybe shes in shock, in that case. "FIRE!, clear your desk out." but yeah, she would have let off a few rounds to make sure.
Also, are the London underground THAT on time. like within 5 seconds of the explosion there's a train.
But. he knew bond would be stood there right? He planned it. So why didn't he put the explosives where bond stood?...not very brainy
I would have to argue that yes this was the best Bond film yet in my opinion as it was the most "believable", especially after Brosnan's escapades.
Quick question...
Silver's helicopter at the end, did it have the insignia on the side of the 'evil group' Bond had been chasing in Craig's previous two films, or was that something else?
Replies
So yeah, I'm gonna check it out.
And that promotion is awesome. I think I would have made it, but I would have just slammed right into a lot of that. Like the guys with the glass window, or those two joggers.
neat stuff.
glottis, that is fucking cool. Beat the first one. dont have time to finish the rest. ill try again later.
I beat the first one as well... 2 tries to get the right approach. I like it so far. The second one seems more intense.
(My name wont be in the credits, but the company I contract at should be.)
just came from the cinema, loved it! soo much better than quantum, maybe that's partly why it comes off so well, but it's packed full of great imagery, locations, sets, and ideas. very satisfied with the movie. Javier rocks, just the right level of menace, creepiness and humour
there are a few holes you could pick at if you're so inclined, like
Other thnigs:
- Moneypenny was hot
- No way he could bone the Asian by simply stepping into her shower
- Putting a towel on the shot-agent at the beginning was srs 'stablizing him' procedure
- Chase scene was a letdown
- When Bond was operating the fork-machine on the train, he got shot. The guy had the upper-ground, being armed, and Bond was helpless. Yet, when Bond steps out of the machine to the open, we see the guy left his winning position and was even taken by surprise when Bond came up behind him. Oh please.. too easy!
Casino Royal was fantastics. Le Chiffre posed a real mental challange to Bond, not only in the poker but also when he got captured & tortured. In Skyfall the same thing happened, the capturing, the girl and her being played as as a card by the villian, but it didn't seem to care to Bond. There was no depth to the relationships
Shotgun:
-yes!
-yeah, I thought the same
-That was the point, he couldn't stabilize the guy because M was ordering him on.
-the opening one? I loved it! Motorcross bikes over ancient turkish roofs!
-yeaahhh. Im glad they made the bullet wound a big thing, because it felt like a big deal that he got hit, but it probably should have happened later in that scene.
I think it had more depth than you give it credit for: (huge spoilers)
I thought the main plot with the bad guy was entertaining, but so disjointed and full of holes it made no fucking sense. Like why he had such a roundabout way of capturing M if he was so capable and had so many inside men. But I never noticed this in the film, because there was the M/bond plot tying things together. Alot of the film is about Bond feeling betrayed by M but going back to help protect her. This is important because, as it is revealed, He couldn't 'protect' his parents at skyfall. Given that he joined the service at such a young age, M has become a mother figure to him, (I don't think they needed wossisname to be yelling MOTHER! at the end of the film like a psycho to hammer that one in. Bit dumb.) This is why he takes her to skyfall manor as well.
Still it was a bit contrived. the whole 'lets go to a remote location with no backup and invite the bad guys over' did not strike me as a sound plan at any point. wtf.
This is so stereotypically bond, of course it's unrealistic but it just fits.
Adele Music is alright, a bit more "Bond", but thats because its nearly exactly like Diamonds are forever!
Villian was really good.
kinda knew M would die about halfway through and I also knew Ralph would be stepping in. Something gave it away but, I knew.
Q........ the super intelligent, cocky as fuck kid, thinking he's the brainiest shit on the block..... plugs the villians (who we already know is a computer wiz) laptop into the entire network and not a secure "off the grid" system and thinks it'll be fine. Coz i'm the greatest ever...... "uh oh, we've been hacked".............. FIRED! go and empty your desk. Then go back to your old job acting on the IT crowd.
Yeah, plan to hole up in an empty castle was a bit silly as well
All in all though. Excellent! go see it.
Skyfall is a terrific Bond movie and Mendes has delivered a very good and well made movie. Roger Deakin's photography is excellent and the talents of Alexander Witt as 2nd Unit Dir, and Stuart Baird as Editor are also visible too.
Skyfall is certainly better than Quantum of Solace, but at the same time I don't believe QoS is that bad. It's just a different context. QoS looks kinda rushed and unfinished (you have to watch it directly after Royale for it to work. QoS is basically Casino Royale Pt2), whereas Skyfall seems to have a more crafted feel to it.
I think the reason for this is the gap between the films. Royale appeared 4 years after Brosnan bowed out on the poor Die Another Day (the franchises 40th anniversary), and immediately looked fresher. QoS was only 2 years after Royale and was lacking. Skyfall has come 4 years from QoS and it really shows. The longer gap (studio troubles aside) has really allowed the producers to spend more time on development. The script feels more snappy, well tuned and with better pacing. There's also been alot more previs produced as well, which really helps the set pieces.
The plot and story is wafer thin, and became predictable for me, but the film compensates that by presenting and delivering it well. Craig is good and feels more relaxed after his difficult second 'album' QoS. Dench is very good and though I haven't liked her that much recent movies, she's good here. It was good to see a little more of Rory Kinnear's character Tanner, he's a fine actor and I hoped he would be used more. Whishaw's debut of Q is understated but also well done. Fiennes, Harris and Finney, very good all round.
Which brings me to Javier Bardem.....is he a good actor - yes, is he a good villan - yes, is he the right villan for this Bond movie - I'm not sure. A good performance yes, slightly comedic and camp in places, but I didn't quite grasp the credibility of his background. Not when you look at Sean Beans character in Goldeneye or Carlyle in TWINE. I think those characters would of been a slightly better fit for Skyfall.
My only other minor gripe in turns of characters, was that it would of been good to of seen something of Jeffrey Wright's broody Felix Leiter (he was great in Royale and QoS).
Having heard alot of Adele's song, I initially thought that it was kinda ok, but nothing special, but it's definitely a grower and like all Bond songs, works better in the context. Thomas Newman's score is very good, it's snappy at times with touches of Bourne, but well done. John Barry said that if ever got himself into trouble you can always fall back on the Bond motif, and Newman also uses this at the right times.
Being the 50th anniversary of Bond, there's always expectations among fans of in-jokes and references to previous movies. Die Another Day tried the same, but at times they shoehorned too much. Skyfall has plenty, some obvious, some more cryptic but the balance is right.
Overall a very well made and accomplished Bond movie. I'm gonna hold back from the 'best Bond ever' tag, as I think its a term that gets waved too easily. You can't really compare Skyfall to the other movies, as with the Bonds they're about the era they're made. Royale and QoS were Bonds of the noughties, but Skyfall is definitely a Bond for 2010s.
Goldfinger was where all the pieces and formula that we have come to know from the Bond movies and franchise, finally came together to make the recipe. Skyfall does seem like the Goldfinger for the audience of today.
The colors and shots in Shanghai were gorgeous.
Tokyo?
My mistake. Shanghai.
not really sure actually why he needed to go via underground, why not just sort of, sneak into London like the agent that he is. He did want a chance to talk to M one last time so that could be the actual motivation
http://www.jingdaily.com/can-hollywood-china-co-productions-bridge-the-audience-gap/20454/
On the torch thing, you have to remember that the grounds keeper was probably in shock too, he would usually use a torch at night so automatically used one when they were escaping?
Faaaairly sure that's been the point of Bond for all of it's 50 years. These aren't chicks he's gonna be taking home to mom. The relationships that mattered, showed.
I have to say tho, that Javier Bardems character didn't quite make the memorable villain that i was hoping he was going to be.
BUT WATCH IT ON THE BIG SCREEN! so many colors, so pretty. I still stick with Casino Royale being the best one so far.
Doh
I mean the relationships between the characters, not the sex-relationships
When the villain showed his deformation and confronted 'mother' ... that was the end of that part. Could have been so much more!
When the Asian was put to 'trial' ... who cared?
Despite all of the villain's prowess, he died from a ... ? come on. There was no mental confrontation. He was just an obsessed goon. Considering Bardem's acting ability, it was a missed opportunity, IMO
Moneypenny's action at the beginning of the movie could have been played out where Bond would have been put to a similar test against her or something, I dunno. Everything was good, at its essence, just wasn't 'exploited' all the way
Also, are the London underground THAT on time. like within 5 seconds of the explosion there's a train.
But. he knew bond would be stood there right? He planned it. So why didn't he put the explosives where bond stood?...not very brainy
I would have to argue that yes this was the best Bond film yet in my opinion as it was the most "believable", especially after Brosnan's escapades.
Quick question...
I don't know why me and my crush laugh so hard at this scene.