As long as they make it better, they could easily re-interpret the creature design. Giger's still around and he has what, 3 decades' worth of nightmares accumulated for inspiration? And now that it doesn't have to be a man in suit, they could really set him loose... In fact I'd prefer them to be daring and take risks with…
Please... NO. Don't get me wrong, Alien films (INCLUDING the one made by Jeunet) is by far my favorite s-f series, but they really ruined the creature "reputation" in the AvP films (doggy, doggy !) and with the current industry attitude with big "past" licence, it will definitly be a crappy over-the-top blockbuster…
The problem with this statement is that effects technology was not a defining characteristic of Alien - the story was. In Alien, the creature is developed in such a way to convey just how tough it is to kill, how keenly-honed its survival instincts are, and how it is to be hunted by a solitary, ruthlessly-efficient…
Aliens is my favorite movie....ever. At the same time, I am very fond of the original Alien, and I have no problem with Ridley Scott helming this latest effort. Most encouraging for me is the fact that they are going to set it as a prequel, and they have a very large time frame within the continuity of the series to take…
I liked Aliens more than Alien because of the fierce pace and tension that was set. Of course when I saw it I was a teen. When I saw Alien it was creepy as hell, especially when the android goes insane, the white liquid made an impression. :D The Aliens are shot in such a way that you imagine huge speed, hordes and hordes…
when i said cameron pulled lots of tricks i meant the film aliens included much more ambitious shots that required special effects (model in the foreground, actual set in the background to increase room size etc.) than ridley. cameron wasnt michael bay any means either as he used means much less expensive than creating…