Actually, now it hit me, the reason why your tv looks so good is that you're watching 1024x768 on your 1280x768 TV, keeping with the idea that it is aspect correct: it doesn't have to scale, it's pixel perfect!, while the same content watched on your bigger monitor will have to fall back on scaling. And now considering…
You have to be more precise, no specs at all were mentioned. is it a 720p or 1080p tv?, do you have any latency-expensive modes running on the tv? Is it aspect-correct on both the tv and monitor? (4:3 on 16:10/9)
Why cant my graphics card just do 4 native pixels = 1 game res pixel? Or would that take more processing power than running in native? Come to think of it that would be 800x450 and be terribly blocky, so I guess theres no solution? So the verdict is, tvs have bigger, and fewer pixels. jeff, i've never had any problems with…
You could AA if you really wanted, but the most natural AA without any performance hit would be as Justin said, sitting far away from the screen. Try sitting right next to the TV, and having it exactly encase view, you'll start noticing color bleeding, blurred pixels at edges as so on and forth. If anything, I would say…
what's to stop you from looking secondhand? yes, it's harder to source, but i'd rather get the undisputed best CRT in the world than have to deal with the crapshoot that comes with buying an LCD. i got my fw900 for $50 and i see people get them for free quite often... you just need to stop being lazy and look beyond the…
buy a CRT, srs. lcd monitors are fixed resolution displays, meaning that they have a finite amount of pixels vertically and horizontally. in order to use a lower resolution on that fixed resolution display, it must scale the video source up using a chip to resample it to the bigger resolution of your display. these chips…