Digital art really doesn't have the aspect of accident, and having to work with them and mistakes, with digital people rely to much on the undo key. They are both a very different process.
This could definitely bloom into a pretty big debate, worthy of its own thread. But I think the primary counterargument isn't to say that digital is not art or is irrelevant as art, but more to say that most (not all) great digital artists have "done their time" with traditional media, and that the physicality and as…
why does this need to be a god dammed debate, cant we just post some drawings and admire everyone elses work? Also claiming that digital is similar enough to traditional to post here is defeating the purpose of this thread. The whole point is that digital is faster for games development so not many of us do actually do…
you're right it is subjective, and I was talking of my own experience, I did try digital with Painter and PS and I dont find them rewarding at all. in fact with a small wacom its a complete pain in the arse.. with a large canvas and a brush I can paint with my whole arm which I love doing. Theres more freedom and I do find…
Digital is the new traditional. I honestly can't bring myself to do real 'traditional' art anymore. They take up so much space. You have to scan them to share them with online buddies. They can be ruined if not stored properly. Yeah, bah.
cool stuff! Something I noticed in my last stint of non-digital work - I get a real kick out of making the marks, that might sound lame maybe but there's something about making a good mark that really hits the spot. What can I say, I'm easily pleased! :D