This is cool: http://www.silktide.com/ This is an automatic website quality testing application. It rates Marketing (How well marketed, and popular the website is), Design (How well designed and built the website is), Accessibility (How accessible the website is, particularly to those with disabilities), and Experience…
Marketing 6.7 Design 5.6 Accessibility 9.3 Experience 6.1 Visitor rating Warning This website cannot be voted for technical reasons. No votes Overall 6.6 The warning comes from the stupid javascript ads the host puts in there, as do most complaints about poor design (No CSS? WTF?) that make any sense (Forms???…
[ QUOTE ] news.bbc.co.uk: 9.5 (still got hit by the disabled part though) [/ QUOTE ] LOL, that is great. If that was a California law and it was a US news based site there would already be a lawsuit.
Got bored and threw them the major/popular news sites just to see what they thought: drudgereport.com: 7.6 ABCnews.com: 7.6 CBSnews.com: 7.8 news.google.com: 8.0 Foxnews.com: 8.2 CNN.com: 8.6 news.bbc.co.uk: 9.5 (still got hit by the disabled part though) The quick and dirty page for my program managed to get this:…
Marketing 7.6 Design 7.8 Accessibility 7.8 Experience 6.0 Overall 6.9 Ah well let down by the overall experience Apparently my website is ranked 611 in the world.
Ahh Rick, I was hoping you would show up I don't wanna derail the thread, but are you in the mood to answer a few more questions? Just in case... I have a visitor counter that rolled over at 9999 and was at 86 this morning. I emailed techsupport and they corrected it, but also told me this.... Also please be aware that you…
Dukester - some hosts or web url providers have a system where your site is hosted inside a frame. The main frame is the url, and the contents of the frame is your site. That would explain both problems.