So why did you reply? What things did you change exactly? The images on your homepage still do not utilize the watermark, which defeats the purpose of the site.
Not back to start the dialogue up, life got in the way, and I just got done making some adjustments to the site, etc.. and items were tweaked related to feedback from this forum. Just wanted to thank everyone for their input, it helped us look at from a different angle. It doesn't matter whether your input made me feel…
I really do appreciate the direct feedback from everyone. There’s a lot in here that’s useful, even if some of it is coming in a bit hot. A few clarifications and a couple things I clearly need to improve. This is a not-for-profit endeavor that started out as a discussion with other design professionals and when I found…
I want to say thank you for this response, when I referred to negative, I meant suggesting I was a bot and all that I am writing isn't real, it just seemed like it is an immediate assumption and attack formation was automatic. With that said, I didn't disappear when people didn't welcome this with open arms, I have come…
The site does not get to the point, right away. In my opinion, you need to explain exactly what is being proposed, and do it "above the fold" which is immediately on the first homepage view, before someone has to scroll down. I don't see how the CAHDD system actually works, until I get to the How it Works page, and even…
Thanks for the feedback. I asked for it, and I meant that. I started to get defensive, so needed to regroup and strip things down. A few of the points hit harder than I expected, especially around how the site comes across. Fair criticism. Some of that is already being adjusted. To be clear on intent, this is not about…
The reply looks legit to me, just long winded, as he admits. The images on the site are the most visual thing you have, so I’d suggest choosing imagery that doesn’t scream AI-Gen. Every image I looked at on the home page had that ai look… overly saturated colors, glowy lighting, mushy hands, errors in the details (Porsche…
I would then suggest clarifying the provenance for all the images on your site. The majority of your illustrations look 100% AI generated, and a footer disclaimer really isn't enough clarity. "Eat your own dogfood" as they say.
Yes, this has been mentioned and discussed, I am working on a way to add watermarks, etc. To images on the site that are applied after the page is rendered out so that they don't get cropped, which is the issue we were running into. I think I have it figured out, addressing this item first as it seemed to be the priority…
You are correct the geometry is incorrect at the body panel seem between front bumper cover and fender, if you had left just the markup of the image of a 944 turbo in question it would have been a far stronger statement than then providing an image of a normally aspirated 944 which is what you showed implying the original…