That's the reason Dynamesh Master is recommended. Instead of guessing the Dynamesh resolution you just type the number of polys you aim for and it will try its best to deliver
Wondering, how is everyone getting such clean results with Dynamesh? Whenever I dynamesh an object, I always get ugly edges like this: Instead of nice clean edges Cheers
How do you get the dynamesh to play properly once the booleaned mesh is all faceted out when dealing with round objects? When the dynamesh smooths out the facets don't go away.
@Musashidian, no - I'm referring to the ugly results on my own test with Dynamesh (see a few posts above.) @Perna, fair enough yeah - I'll probably give this a go with Dynamesh Master instead to see if that yields a better result for me; just a bit confused as why generally people's meshes are coming out super clean with…
Yeah, I get the whole exagerrating smoothness part. :) Bakes edges generally come out better when you slightly over-soften edges. This is the image I'm referencing when I talk about crisp edges after dynamesh: Notice how crisp and perfect all of the edges are on this model after the Dynamesh? Unless I'm…
Not quite, I always recommend bringing in dense geo for curves. Think of dynamesh and polish as nothing but a minimum edge width pass. Large curved features should be defined in the boolean stage as much as possible. That said, a good addition to this method that Harry Ridgeway informed me of, is to set polygroups by…