What I'm trying to say is: The stack is not pivotal to the way I work. I mean the actual assembly of modifiers subsequently building off of each other. Modifiers themselves are a huge part of my workflow, and I view them as time saving operations to be committed to the model, nothing more. I'm not sure what our disconnect…
@aregvan @guitarguy00 You're welcome. Glad it was helpful. Thank you to everyone else who posts questions and answers too. Relying on tools to generate geometry just means avoid doing unnecessary manual work when there's a tool or modifier that will do the job quicker and more accurately. Here's an example of manual work.…
Uhm, actually model created in 2 parts, shell and a regular sphere inside. Because they have got float distance between (doesn't touch each other), it's not a negative extrude/bevel seam. Yeah, but modeling steps is similar. * Start with a sphere 32x. +Editpoly modifier * Select some loops, chamfer edges (in max chamfer a…
Hello there @@IronLover64 Your last post shows your main problem. Working on subdivision levels all the time is the easiest way to messy model that you simply can't edit. I will give you a little bit different approach to this. And that is: Take a break. Don't get me wrong, i don't want to discurage you at all. What i mean…
@Yogifi There's a lot to unpack but the answer to most of these questions is: it often depends. There's a significant amount of overlap between poly modeling and subdivision modeling but they are still distinct processes that require slightly different approaches. What's "right" or "best" depends entirely on how a model…
@rogi92 Which approach is best will often depend on the specifics of a project's technical requirements. There's a lot of ways to approach modeling this part but there's also a lot of different factors that can influence modeling strategy decisions. Broad, open ended questions lack the context required to provide…
Thanks @Joao Sapiro, Yeah I understand and actually that was part of the reason for snipping, it seemed like I was off to a very bad start and I didnt want any new potential commenters to write me off straight away, I guess it didnt achieve the desired affect. I do appreciate the time everyone takes to post here and you…
@PixelMagic It's difficult to provide more focused feedback without seeing any specific examples of the topology layout's you've tried and the smoothing errors you've encountered. Most of the advice that's been provided should get you close to some kind of usable result but there's no real way around the fact that it will…
@JBurk Looks like you're on the right track and the process just need some minor adjustments. Once the block out is complete (and all the shape intersections have matching segment counts) just maintain the same segment count ratios when increasing the geometry density of the cage mesh. The appropriate amount of starting…
@tatertots In general: it's best practice to maintain the concentricity and consistent spacing of the edge segments that make up the walls of cylindrical shapes. Moving the edge segments too far out of position will cause the subdivision smoothing to either pinch or pull the mesh around the shape intersection and this can…