Home› Technical Talk

Artifacts in normal map...

pillowsama
pillowsama
polycounter lvl 17
Offline / Send Message
pillowsama polycounter lvl 17
I've generated my normal map in maya using the transfer map for both the head and the body... but after rendering, artifacts show up for the body (quite clearly too..) but not for the head, does anyone know why this is?? the image below shows the artifacts that i talked about..
issuesbm2.jpg
Shot at 2007-07-28

Any help would be appreciated, thnx guys!!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Replies

  • Chai
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Chai polycounter lvl 17
    I'm not sure which artifacts you're reffering to ... do you mean the smoothing errors ? (the black spots around the sharp lowpoly areas)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MoP
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    MoP polycounter lvl 18
    Almost looks like image compression to me ... what format is that normal map saved as?
    Unfortunately I have no experience with Maya's normal mapping so I can't help further.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Asthane
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Asthane polycounter lvl 18
    What MoP said, also-- what are the maps' respective resolutions? (Or if they're on the same map, equative UV space)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fritz
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    fritz polycounter lvl 18
    yeah. to me it looks as tho you may have given lots more space for the head as opposed to the body.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joshua Stubbles
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Joshua Stubbles polycounter lvl 19
    [ QUOTE ]
    yeah. to me it looks as tho you may have given lots more space for the head as opposed to the body.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Ditto.
    The body's texel area looks to be about 1/2 of what you gave the head. Can you show us the UV map for this? Or is it different textures? Did you use 1 512x512 for the head, and 1 512x512 for the body? That would be why it looks so bad. You need to keep the texel density even.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mongrelman
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Mongrelman polycounter lvl 18
    Make sure you've merged uvs on your low poly before baking, I've forgotten to do that before and got some artifacting which was fixed when I merged and rebaked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pillowsama
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    pillowsama polycounter lvl 17
    ahhh i see, thnx guys! well, I used a 1024 map for the head, and 1024 map for the body, these are just for testing though, first time running it through maya for normal map..

    I will try to keep them even, and this is saved as jpeg, that's wut i was thinking about too, checked on some forum regarding the issue and it mentioned file compression...

    what formats are generaly recommended for normal maps? I wanna try and avoid the artifacts because I am doing this for my portfolio, and it needs to look as good as possible haha thnx guys!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fritz
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    fritz polycounter lvl 18
    use targas. if you have an alpha channel in any of your maps that you are using for transparency....save as 32 bit. actually, i just save everything as 32 bit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pillowsama
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    pillowsama polycounter lvl 17
    To Fritz:I tried it out, and it works perfectly! thnx a lot!

    To Chai: yah the weird shadings turned out to be the normals facing the wrong way and i fixed that too, thnx for pointing that out man

    Thnx for the help guys, I'll post some updates later on for you guys so maybe i could get some critiques, thnx a lot!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MoP
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    MoP polycounter lvl 18
    Yeah, JPEG is a compressed format, it will create artifacts like that no matter how you save it.
    TGA is uncompressed and definitely what you should be using here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ryan Clark
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ryan Clark polycounter lvl 18
    If you want a format that's pixel-perfect and web-compatible, use PNG. Most web browsers know how to show PNGs, but not TGAs.

    Also, I usually find PNGs are smaller than TGAs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Asthane
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Asthane polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    If you want a format that's pixel-perfect and web-compatible, use PNG. Most web browsers know how to show PNGs, but not TGAs.

    Also, I usually find PNGs are smaller than TGAs.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    We're talking about what to save the normal map as, not the screenshot wink.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ryan Clark
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Ryan Clark polycounter lvl 18
    Yeah, png's a better format for that too. It makes smaller files than tga and supports higher bit-depths.

    Web-compatibility is just icing on the cake, because it lets png work as a lossless replacement for jpeg across the board.

    I guess smaller files aren't that big a deal, and most people aren't using high bit depths... but it's nice to have one file format that works for everything.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Eric Chadwick
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Eric Chadwick admin
    Yeah, PNG's a great format for web or storage, but I think it should be mentioned that ultimately a compressed lossless PNG will be uncompressed at render time, potentially wasting valuable video memory. Probably more than the OP wants to know, but good to know about anyhow. There are a few lossless and lossy formats you can use specifically for normalmaps... ST3C, 8.8 DDS, DXT5nm, etc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.