Home Technical Talk

3ds max bake seams !?

Hello Everyone :D

I'm trying to do a bake but i keep getting seams :(

What am i doing wrong !?

bakeseam.jpg

Replies

  • Noors
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Noors greentooth
    What are you baking ? Normal map ? Lighting map ?
    What shader ?
    Did you offset by 1 the symmetrical uv's ?
  • Gazu
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Gazu polycounter lvl 12
    The Sphere Shape has a cut in the middle.
    Cut = New Smoothing Group.

    Do the upper one to maybe SG 1, and the other to SG 2
    Or set your SGs to UV Shells with TexTools under "Tools"
  • RappyBMX
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    i'm baking normal map... with or without the ao diffuse it looks the same...
    actually just the ao looks ok no seams, but when i enable the normal the seams appear...

    yes i have offset'ed the symmetrical faces.
    only the selected faces are in the main uv space...
  • bcottage
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    bcottage polycounter lvl 13
    Put it in engine. 3ds max never displays normal maps properly.
  • Obscura
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Obscura grand marshal polycounter
    bcottage wrote: »
    Put it in engine. 3ds max never displays normal maps properly.

    This is interesting cause I always get the best result when I'm viewing my normalmapped models in 3ds max :\

    Anyways, Gazu is right, it can be a smoothing group issue. But I would simply not symmetry the uvs of this model.
  • RappyBMX
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    i tried to do SGs to UV Shells (on the right) but still broken...
    from what i've read you should brake the SGs only when it's a 90deg+

    bakeseam2.jpg
  • RappyBMX
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Obscura wrote: »
    But I would simply not symmetry the uvs of this model.

    why not !?

    i'm thinking of making a 1k map for the entire model !?

    this is the entire model
    screen5.jpg
  • Obscura
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Obscura grand marshal polycounter
    You will always get very slight seams. Even if everything is perfect. Will the player be able to see that piece from this close? I don't think. If you would view your model from a reasonable distance, I'm sure you wouldnt notice any seam. I would not symmetry it to give less chance for seams, and because it doesn't take too much uv space, and because then the symmetry would be visible in the diffuse/specular. If I would symmetry, then I would do it in the middle, vertically, and not horizontally along the whole mesh. Putting the cuts to less noticeable(like to corners) areas would be also reduce the visible seams.the other way to reduce them is to add a bit more geo. But still, from a reasonable distance, none of the seams would be visible. I would say remove that symmetry, or put it to a better place, place your uv cuts better, bake, and view your model from the distance like on your last picture where you are showing the whole model, and lets see if the seams are still disturbingly visible.
  • RappyBMX
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    I guess you are right :( but the model is more for learning though...
    One of the things doing wrong was making the high poly borders to tight :|
    Also in most of the cases when the low poly mesh is bigger than the hp it will not bake right...

    screen7.jpg
  • Obscura
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Obscura grand marshal polycounter
    Your observations are right :)
  • Neox
    Options
    Offline / Send Message
    Neox godlike master sticky
    well, in a synced environment you will not always get seams, you will get no seams.
    Ok thats not etirely true, texture compression can create slight seams

    But the problem with max is, that the renderer you use to bake your normals in max, isn't synced to the viewport. Great eh? So use 3point shader and qualified normals to sync your bake to your viewport.
    Or render it using tge renderer you baked it with, you should see no seams there.
Sign In or Register to comment.