the bottom? srs?
There are some loose edges but imo the base of the body is the area of least concern in that regard. Keep in mind the scale of the object, all those bevels are probably sub 1mm
For the model, IMO the biggest thing is that the scale of details look a little off, skewing the scale of the model.
the "glass" area on the lower back there, isn't glass or an LCD, but a place to hold the bit of cardboard from your film so your remember the ISO/# of exposures.
Replies
There are some loose edges but imo the base of the body is the area of least concern in that regard. Keep in mind the scale of the object, all those bevels are probably sub 1mm
I happen to have a SMC takumar 50mm f2 sitting here disassembled if you want some detail shots.
Plenty of spotmatics as well and a K1000, but not the specific body you have there, probabbly not of much use.
What is that an ME? Looks sort of like a pentax program but not quite.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/pentax/35mm/cameras/me.htm
For the model, IMO the biggest thing is that the scale of details look a little off, skewing the scale of the model.
the "glass" area on the lower back there, isn't glass or an LCD, but a place to hold the bit of cardboard from your film so your remember the ISO/# of exposures.
nice model! but maybe little bit fat than the real one. maybe becuz the fov of the camera?