Home General Discussion

Nintendo balance board provides cheap alternative for stroke victims

Junkie_XL
polycounter lvl 14
Offline / Send Message
Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
http://gizmodo.com/5450150/in-early-tests-99-wii-balance-board-outperforms-17885-medical-rig

Another day, another story about some cheap, plastic Wii motion control accessory finding an application outside of gaming. In this case, it's the balance board, and not only is this device helping stroke victims recover, it's saving them money, too. In fact, doctors at the University of Melbourne found that the balance board, normally used for pseudo Yoga or navigating Mii's down a virtual ski slope, was so sensitive it could very well replace traditional laboratory-grade "force platforms" doctors use to assess a patient's balance.
When doctors disassembled the board, they found the accelerometers and strain gauges to be of "excellent" quality. "I was shocked given the price: it was an extremely impressive strain gauge set-up," said lead researcher Ross Clark, in an interview with New Scientist.
Even better, Clark's team has already published a paper that verifies the Wii balance board is "clinically comparable" to the nearly $18,000 lab force platform. That's great news for many smaller physio clinics that would otherwise be unable to afford the traditional rig. URL="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527435.300-wii-board-helps-physios-strike-a-balance-after-strokes.html"]New Scientist[/URL
Send an email to Jack Loftus, the author of this post, at jloftus@gizmodo.com.

Really amazing. A $100 Wii accessory outperforms something the medical industry uses that costs $18,000.

[edited out because people don't like alternative viewpoints]

Replies

  • eld
    Offline / Send Message
    eld polycounter lvl 18
    But I'm betting the hardware they have in hospitals are not from 2009, stuff does become cheaper to make over years, even to the point where it is put into consumer end hardware.
  • aesir
    Offline / Send Message
    aesir polycounter lvl 18
    I'm pretty sure that didn't really prove anything related to government regulation, but cool none the less.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    aesir wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure that didn't really prove anything related to government regulation, but cool none the less.

    You honestly think the Wii Balance board could remain at $100 if it still had to go through all the same costly medical device regulations that products deemed more official have to go through?

    http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=279

    Read steps 1 & 2. (I don't condone #4 for the record)


    Also see here for a related topic...

    http://www.pointoflaw.com/columns/archives/002821.php
  • Mark Dygert
    Shouldn't they get the balance boards certified to be used as a medical device before they use it as such?
    Wouldn't that skyrocket the price of the balance boards?

    The free market will kick in and any savings in the production cost will more than likely go right into padding the bottom line not really a discount to consumer. Why lower your price and cut what could be a huge profit margin when you're customers are already used to paying insane prices.

    Unless there is some actual competition which I don't see, the prices will stay up as high as they can keep them, which is another awesome rule of the free market... Charge the most that people can pay before they go to your competition.

    If your competition likes to have high profit margins maybe you can settle on an unwritten agreement to leave prices high, another awesome way the free market system rocks.

    Great for making money, bad for actually driving down costs.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    Really amazing. A $100 Wii accessory outperforms something the medical industry uses that costs $18,000.

    Government is the cause of high priced medical care. They are not the solution. The Wii Fit balance board isn't bound by all the expensive medical device regulations congress imposes on products before they are put on the market.

    As said, that has nothing to do with government regulation.

    Junkie.. Look up supply and demand. I don't mean to be demeaning. But A: Wii was sold initially at a very low profit margin. The money is in the games. B: The Wii is made by the factor of 10 than those devices. C: Those devices paved the way for the Wii. Finally. D: Those are made by private Health Companies.

    If anything, you have just made an argument against for Profit Health companies.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    oXYnary wrote: »
    As said, that has nothing to do with government regulation.

    Junkie.. Look up supply and demand. I don't mean to be demeaning. But A: Wii was sold initially at a very low profit margin. The money is in the games. B: The Wii is made by the factor of 10 than those devices. C: Those devices paved the way for the Wii. Finally. D: Those are made by private Health Companies.

    If anything, you have just made an argument against for Profit Health companies.

    Your argument would hold water until I mention something called "Lasik". Where the price is constantly dropping all the time. What used to be a $10,000 procedure is now $500

    Every other thing medical related goes up in price year after year despite more people demanding a medical service. Lasik is not under heavy regulation and it is also not covered under health insurance.
  • aesir
    Offline / Send Message
    aesir polycounter lvl 18
    Once again, you seem to be arguing against the current de-regulated system of for-profit health care where everyone tries to wrangle every last penny away from the insurance companies and that gets passed to us.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Does anyone on the internet know what 'proves' means?
  • Slum
    Offline / Send Message
    Slum polycounter lvl 18
    Why couldn't this thread be about how somebody found a cool medical use for a game toy, instead of a BS political thread that will end up like an episode of the View till somebody gets annoyed enough to lock it.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    Slum wrote: »
    Why couldn't this thread be about how somebody found a cool medical use for a game toy, instead of a BS political thread that will end up like an episode of the View till somebody gets annoyed enough to lock it.

    I thought it'd make for good debate as to why medical costs are so high. If you don't care then don't post and never complain in the future about the high price of medical care.

    People who don't care to analyze the issue are the ones who tend to get screwed over the most.
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    Your argument would hold water until I mention something called "Lasik". Where the price is constantly dropping all the time. What used to be a $10,000 procedure is now $500

    Every other thing medical related goes up in price year after year despite more people demanding a medical service. Lasik is not under heavy regulation and it is also not covered under health insurance.


    You make assumptions without all the knowledge. It could easily be because as it become more well known, the cheaper it became in volume. IE... Again. Supply and demand.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    oXYnary wrote: »
    You make assumptions without all the knowledge. It could easily be because as it become more well known, the cheaper it became in volume. IE... Again. Supply and demand.

    From my previous post...

    Eliminate all licensing requirements for medical schools, hospitals, pharmacies, and medical doctors and other health care personnel. Their supply would almost instantly increase, prices would fall, and a greater variety of health care services would appear on the market.

    Competing voluntary accreditation agencies would take the place of compulsory government licensing--if health care providers believe that such accreditation would enhance their own reputation, and that their consumers care about reputation, and are willing to pay for it.

    Because consumers would no longer be duped into believing that there is such a thing as a "national standard" of health care, they will increase their search costs and make more discriminating health care choices.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    I thought it'd make for good debate as to why medical costs are so high. If you don't care then don't post and never complain in the future about the high price of medical care.

    People who don't care to analyze the issue are the ones who tend to get screwed over the most.

    Do you have any education as an economist, a political philosopher, or a medical engineer?

    Do you find it productive when people who can't draw a square start 'debates' on art?
  • oXYnary
    Offline / Send Message
    oXYnary polycounter lvl 18
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    From my previous post...

    Eliminate all licensing requirements for medical schools, hospitals, pharmacies, and medical doctors and other health care personnel. Their supply would almost instantly increase, prices would fall, and a greater variety of health care services would appear on the market.

    Competing voluntary accreditation agencies would take the place of compulsory government licensing--if health care providers believe that such accreditation would enhance their own reputation, and that their consumers care about reputation, and are willing to pay for it.

    Because consumers would no longer be duped into believing that there is such a thing as a "national standard" of health care, they will increase their search costs and make more discriminating health care choices.

    A licensing requirement is a static price. Does it add to the cost? Yes. Will supply and demand offset it. Yes. next.
  • bugo
    Offline / Send Message
    bugo polycounter lvl 17
    thing is, the equipment for medical stuff wont be sold as much as the numbers of wii in the market, that's the thing.
  • Mark Dygert
    A deregulated free market approach is what we have now and we have it to thank for the mess we're in now. As it follows another free market rule, charge the most your customers can cough up. They aren't beholden to the patient they're beholden to the shareholder who wants to see higher profits not a healthier public.

    How is giving them a higher profit margin going to drive down costs. Right now any cost saving goes right to the shareholders, not lower costs.
  • blankslatejoe
    Offline / Send Message
    blankslatejoe polycounter lvl 19
    Might be worth adding in that, the way a lot of medical procedures and medicines go in the states, the creating company has a patent 'grace window' during which they are permitted to monopolize the product. The idea is that this to recoup the cost of researching and developing the drug/procedure.

    After a few years (10 I think?) 'generics' versions are allowed to pop up, and the cost of the drug drops significantly. Maybe this, mixed with the supply/demand aspect of simply having more doctors trained in the the process these days, are why things like Lasik drop so much in price?
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    ps. you're obnoxious
  • Joao Sapiro
  • ZacD
    Offline / Send Message
    ZacD ngon master
    Medical applications always need the latest and greatest in technology.

    Stuff like this http://www.livescience.com/technology/091229-3d-bioprinter.html isn't cheap.
  • eld
    Offline / Send Message
    eld polycounter lvl 18
    cue 10 years, "hospital uses new nintendo skin-tissue printing periphiral, much cheaper than 2010's skinprinting machines"
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    I think the low cost and quality of the Wii balance board has a lot more to do with customer expectations and economies of scale than it does regulation-- and I actually attended Mises University.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    SupRore wrote: »
    ps. you're obnoxious

    ps and you're troll with that last post. Nice that people like Vig and joe can post intelligently without attacking.

    btw I'm not coming up with anything on my own that your previous post seems to insinuate. I provided links. Yes a lot of economists are in agreement with it.
  • Joseph Silverman
    Offline / Send Message
    Joseph Silverman polycounter lvl 17
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    ps and you're troll with that last post. Nice that people like Vig and joe can post intelligently without attacking.

    btw I'm not coming up with anything on my own that your previous post seems to insinuate. I provided links. Yes a lot of economists are in agreement with it.

    Proves and now troll, your grasp on internet slang is as unsteady as your hold on the english language.

    You're not coming up with anything, presenting anything in a coherent manner, saying anything true, or demonstrating any understandings of the issue you're 'debating'. You are beating your chest because something sounds good to you, and all of the buffoons who havent realized had better take notice. This is silliness, this is imbecility, and this is not going to educate anyone or foster any intelligent discussion.

    Vig and joe distinguish themselves with a remarkable capacity to humor inane bullshit posted in a pseudo-intellectual frame.
  • EarthQuake
    Junkie_XL wrote: »
    I thought it'd make for good debate as to why medical costs are so high. If you don't care then don't post and never complain in the future about the high price of medical care.

    People who don't care to analyze the issue are the ones who tend to get screwed over the most.

    This would be fine if you actually had any intention of participating in a debate, but you, as you have time and again, are simply looking to berate anyone who will listen with the same, tired talking point over and over. This is not a debate.

    You've taken what is really a cool story, and shat all over it with your own personal agenda.
  • Parnell
    Offline / Send Message
    Parnell polycounter lvl 18
    Ya we should get rid of the FDA.
    Just think of all the awesome drugs we would've gotten faster to the market! Look how great the free market was for toys coming from China too! Lead paint is cheap and really not THAT dangerous right? oooooh wait.

    Eliminate all licensing? Fantastic idea!!
    Hey guys. Parnell Pharmaceuticals has just opened up for business! Yup, I'll sell you whatever you want. I can't verify if what you are getting is what you ordered (cause I've never taken a medical course in my life) but hey IT'S CHEAP. Operators are standing by to sell you whatever you want...because you don't need a prescription! Prescriptions are just more red tape. You want a drug? Just call and we'll sell it to you! Go online, with all my awesome profits I went ahead and created my own local 'voluntary' agencies to make sure I get the highest ratings. Because I know accreditation is important to you consumers so no worries I look safe too!

    Free markets are AWESOME for profit. No doubt, but seriously if you think large corporations are going to care about safety that's hilarious. It's cheaper and more profitable to ship the untested drugs and pay off the people that die or are harmed by the drug.
    B
  • Ninjas
    Offline / Send Message
    Ninjas polycounter lvl 18
    The FDA is a pretty bad example if you are looking to show government working well. Toys from China have caused a minuscule number of deaths compared to FDA approved drugs.
  • Junkie_XL
    Offline / Send Message
    Junkie_XL polycounter lvl 14
    EarthQuake wrote: »
    This would be fine if you actually had any intention of participating in a debate, but you, as you have time and again, are simply looking to berate anyone who will listen with the same, tired talking point over and over. This is not a debate.

    You've taken what is really a cool story, and shat all over it with your own personal agenda.

    That's actually a really unfair claim for this thread. Berate?

    Yeah a personal agenda that cares to lower medical care costs for people. Shame on me...lol

    I'll leave it alone...sheesh.


    edit: Ninjas, how was your experience over at Mises? That's really cool that you attended.
  • divi
    Offline / Send Message
    divi polycounter lvl 12
    i dont get this thread.
  • rooster
    Offline / Send Message
    rooster mod
    I thought this was going to be a nice thread.. I'm outta here
  • arrangemonk
    Offline / Send Message
    arrangemonk polycounter lvl 17
    Americans (especially republicans) are recomended neither to think or talk about health care

    broken balance board has no securtity so tell someone if its broken
    so i think its recomended for home use
    (i imagine a wiifit recover from stroke edition)
  • adam
    Offline / Send Message
    adam polycounter lvl 20
    Check this out! I went to Google, typed in "political message boards", and got 50.9 million (!!!) results.

    Crazy, right???????

    http://www.google.com/search?q=political+message+boards&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
This discussion has been closed.