I know, pretty broad question and probably doesn't apply to every recruitment agency, but I was wondering if recruiters try really hard to sell each individual applicant to companies or if its simply the case of "Hi we are xxx agency, we have a few people who seem to fit this role, here are their CVs, thanks"
Also do you tend to favour applications from a recruitment agency or direct applications from the applicant themselves? Or it doesn't matter at all, and all you want to see is their portfolio? (for an artist)
Replies
From what I've heard, this idea is a thing of the past, seeing as how the market is getting kindof flooded with artists that are willing to work for less and less.
Focus time on improving your craft, only you can make yourself more marketable, not a recruiting agency.
just my opinion sir :P
I'd rather deal with my own business on my own as I can't trust someone to speak for me to people that could very well be my employer / co-workers. I've heard horror stories of agencies blanketing the industry with resumes and would hate to be the victim of that.
That being said, I know a few external recruiters who are cool and if you have absolutely no leads or are in an area where it's difficult to get noticed, maybe it's not a bad idea.
I've never hired people from a recruiter...I'm no longer responsible for interviewing either. When I did though, at my last job, we were only looking at people who applied in person or through their school.
Gav
At our company it doesn't seem to matter at all if you apply yourself, or via a recruiter, as long as your portfolio can speak for itself, and probably more importantly, really fit in with the rest of us. There's also places where, I believe, you can't get an interview unless you go via their specific recruiter.
there must be a few good ones but on the whole in my experience they have been pretty useless. Nobody I know personally has got a job in the industry through an agency, its always been from posting work online or applying direct
Conversely I've had another company that I had registered with years ago call me out of the blue, get my name a little wrong and offer me a car outsourcing job at £10k less that I make.
Even the ones who say "I've just found your portfolio through your LinkedIn profile, would you be interested in doing physics programming for a major games studio in Newcastle?"
As it stands, I think you'll get a much better response and your application will carry a lot more weight if you contact studios yourself.
I can't help but feel that in general they are a pretty tactless bunch and I can't help but
resent that every time I'm in crunch on Gears or UT I tend to get cold called by a series
of recruiters who are circling like vultures in the hope that I'm burned out enough by
crunch that I will listen to them and jump ship.
This happens every year. Likewise, the merest suggestion that I'm content to have them
as a contact through Linked in has led to them proceeeding directly to my work email
looking to set up an interview with the AD at company A or B at my soonest conveniance
which really puts me in an awkward light at work if they monitor email activity!
On the positive side, theres a couple of recruiters that 'touch base' with me via my home
account once or twice a year to see if I'm still happy where I am and thats fine.
My experiences seem to fit with what most have had and I think that makes a lot of companies
view the use as recruiters as problematic to a certain extent and its worth bearing that
in mind when considering using them to find a job.
Knowing how you are being sold as a faceless asset amoungst many other assets is
an important notion to consider.