I seriously suck @ modeling rocks/mountain faces/stones, etc.
I can understand & prefer the method of doing local high-poly information for rocks, that's a lot of fun. Being able to high poly a rock face is great.
But..
When it comes to doing a mountain face, or a lot of rock/stone surface area I can't, for the life of me, wrap my head around the geometry needed to achieve believability.
Anyone have good advice on this? Screenshots of in-3d-appl vs. in-game rocks?
Help a brother out
Replies
I started to read your post several times but I'm not sure if the information provided is what you are stuck on. I'll check on IM and see if I see you.
Alex
What???? :polytwitch:
http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=50160&highlight=rock
seriously, this is an awesome thread, should be able to find something that works for you there.
:P
Anyway, cool thanks Sup.
Also - consider this thread to be more of a rant. I don't have any examples or anything. It's just that modeling rocks, to me, seems to be one of those things that looks horrible up until the very end when all its components come together.
make like 3 or 4 sets of rock formations highpoly etc as unique big rocks, then make the mountain structure out of them etc , or if we are on super texture/poly save mode, a tiling difuse, normal etc and just make te model of it etc and apply that texture, for the grass parts maybe apply a diff texture to those rocks. shit im not amkinig any sense.
Alex
[17:02] MANCHiLD: mudbox, etc
[17:02] MANCHiLD: I think its just I have no confidence in the rock as I model out the render mesh
[17:02] MANCHiLD: I tend to be happy w/ the results when its all textured, lit, etc.
[17:02] MANCHiLD: It just.. seems like a box divided all 3 ways a bunch of times with verts pulled here and there
[17:02] MANCHiLD: Guh, Im rambling
[17:03] Tumerboy: going to the lowest Zbrush level doesn't give you what you want?
[17:03] Tumerboy: or going to a lower level and then reducing in Max/Maya?
[17:04] MANCHiLD: right
[17:04] Tumerboy: " It just.. seems like a box divided all 3 ways a bunch of times with verts pulled here and there"
[17:04] MANCHiLD: but you can't exactly z-brush an entire moountain range
[17:04] Tumerboy: Yup that's what it is
[17:04] Tumerboy: Why not?
[17:04] MANCHiLD: not for this mountain i am doing
[17:04] MANCHiLD: its too close to the player
[17:04] Tumerboy: I mean, it depends I guess, on if you're using a terrain system
[17:04] Tumerboy: What do you mean?
[17:04] MANCHiLD: a normal map specific for a single mountain range would look too low res
[17:05] MANCHiLD: unless you're thinking i should be zbrushign tiling rock textures
[17:05] Tumerboy: OH
[17:05] MANCHiLD: to which i say you are crazy
[17:05] Tumerboy: but I thought you were talking about the topology of the mountain range, not the normal map
[17:05] MANCHiLD: well
[17:05] Tumerboy: And yes, why is it crazy to use zbrush to make tiling rock textures?
[17:05] MANCHiLD: topology is the stage @ which i feel uncomfortable
[17:05] MANCHiLD: but i just feel like my rocks.. dont rock
[17:05] Tumerboy: ok
[17:05] Tumerboy: LOL
[17:05] Tumerboy: can you show me an example? or is this for work?
[17:08] MANCHiLD: no/yes
[17:08] Tumerboy: LOL
[17:08] Tumerboy: ok
[17:08] Tumerboy: So, is the problem with large rock faces? (cliffs mountains etc.?) or close up small round rocks/boulders?
[17:08] MANCHiLD: mm
[17:09] MANCHiLD: sometimes my rocks look like deformed baseballs
[17:09] MANCHiLD: im a lot better now
[17:09] MANCHiLD: i just... take a couple tries @ it
[17:10] Tumerboy: hmm
[17:10] Tumerboy: well, I don't know what to tell you without seeing them
[17:10] Tumerboy: I certainly dont' think I have any magic rock process,
[17:10] MANCHiLD: s'ok
[17:10] Tumerboy: : /
[17:11] MANCHiLD: One thing I think works really well
[17:11] MANCHiLD: which I got from looking @ tf2 maps with their rocks
[17:11] MANCHiLD: is modeling something really simple
[17:11] MANCHiLD: slap on your repeating texture(s)
[17:11] MANCHiLD: and cutting in geometry to help sell the normal map more
[17:11] Tumerboy: ya
[17:11] Tumerboy: I do that
[17:11] Tumerboy: it depends on the game
[17:12] Tumerboy: like, for us, we're an MMO, so we repeat objects like fucking crazy
[17:12] Tumerboy: and try and use tiling textures where ever we can
[17:12] Tumerboy: so I make a rock, throw a tiling texture on there, try to hide the seams
[17:12] MANCHiLD: [CENSORED]
[17:12] Tumerboy: and then throw that 1 rock all over the Fucking place, rotating to every concievable angle, to maximize it's use
[17:12] Tumerboy: LOL
[17:12] Tumerboy: [CENSORED]
[17:12] Tumerboy: LOL
[17:13] Tumerboy: But, like, God of War, they spend 3 months working on 1 environment that gets seen for maybe a minute and a half
[17:13] Tumerboy: they hand zbrush every rock, for every corner
[17:13] Tumerboy: there is NO reusing a rock, and rotating a different direction
[17:13] Tumerboy: so, it totally depends on your game
[17:14] Tumerboy: I've been doing some more, spiry rocks (kind of like TF2's)
[17:14] MANCHiLD: http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=50160&highlight=rock
[17:14] MANCHiLD: this is great info
[17:14] Tumerboy: so I'll make a box roughly the size and shape I want, (maybe with some cuts for divisions between a couple rocks) and then meshsmooth it
[17:14] Tumerboy: move points around etc.
[17:14] Tumerboy: a lot of times, I'll then take a couple of those smaller rocks, and make groups otu of them
[17:15] Tumerboy: ya
[17:15] Tumerboy: I saw those rocks
[17:15] Tumerboy: and they're amazing
[17:15] Tumerboy: but there's little info on HOW other than "mudbox"
[17:17] Tumerboy: the other problem is that rock topology varies greatly depending on the TYPE of rocks you're making
[17:18] Tumerboy: do you have a specific type of rock you're working on?
[17:18] MANCHiLD: uhm
[17:18] MANCHiLD: yes
[17:18] MANCHiLD: MOUNTAIN ROCK
[17:18] MANCHiLD: haha
[17:18] MANCHiLD: sorry, im not a rock expert
[17:18] MANCHiLD: and the concept i am going from is very fantasy based
[17:18] MANCHiLD: hard to describe
[17:20] Tumerboy: ah
[17:20] Tumerboy: ok
[17:20] Tumerboy: ya, that's harder
[17:20] Tumerboy: a lot of times, I'll go through flickr or something, find a type of rock I like, and then take that into photoshop, and try and paint the topology over the picture
[17:20] Tumerboy: to help me get a feel for how it should be laid out
[17:21] Tumerboy: (at least at the rough stage) then from there, I'd model that up, and take that rough shape in to z-brush or mudbox to put in the minor details
[17:21] Tumerboy: maybe you could do that with the concept art?
That's the conversation I just had with Adam via MSN. . . Can anyone tell me what the fuck we were talking about? I really have no idea.
I think we need to take Adam onto that show Intervention. . .
[17:12] Tumerboy: [CENSORED]
[17:12] Tumerboy: LOL
True story.
http://www.zbrushcentral.com/zbc/showthread.php?t=059678
Scroll down, the answers will come to you
that working in a subtractive fashion rather than additive helps aid the creation of
more natural sharp looking edges.
Also, you can skip most of his process after you have made your first final version
and do a Zbrush brush alpha grab of your work then run the exported 16bit alpha through crazybump to add some more realism rock noise over the top.
Once you do that, you build up a collection of brilliant rock alphas which you can just
stamp all over a flat plane if you wish and more quickly make rock 'anything'.
Rock, mountains, paving, concrete are all super easy.
Wood is much harder as your grain needs to flow with the forms ( unless you are just making
planks).
I got my PHD in zbrush stonemasonry on Gears2, rock is super fun and easy once you
build up a collection of a few alphas.
Once you have your alpha you use photoshop and crazybump to simple composite
the alphas or photos you want to combine.
Then set your stroke style to DragRect instead of freehand when you import the new alpha
you have made, then you just drag the alpha ( in this case a rock shape) over your
mesh in zbrush as many times as you like.
No time here for tut's, crunch on gears2.