I wish I was a programmer, so I could convert this MSDN code into a replacement for the Windows default color picker!
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/07/GDIColorPicker/#S9
If it was possible to replace the crappy default picker, then a painting app like Photoshop could use it.
Any programmers interested in a quickie side-project? I'd donate for something like this.
So simple, and yet, so far!
Replies
About the color picker, i think it's better to have something like painter.. imho.
http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=39059
The color wheel is great, and the Mixer tab is also really handy.
I talked with Chris about porting it to Photoshop, but it was too much of a pain to get Adobe's SDK.
I dont think one can simply replace windows gui widgets...
Which begs the question, why if they can write a better color picker than the one they already implement, are they still using it...?
Hopefully they will add something like the Painter color mixer...
... not just Adobe's swatch-maker Kuler.
If they don't get it right, yes, I would love a new PS plugin. Here's a great article about programming for PS.
In the meantime, here's the method most of us use, if I'm not mistaken. Splotches of paint on the border, or a separate image.
I've been spending too much time on this.
arrangemonk, you can get full source for CoolPicker on Chris' site:
http://www.idigitalhouse.com/Tech/dh_tech.html
thats also the reason of my lagg at presence
No, but we can add color picker plugin into photoshop; like
The photoshop sdk works like this :
-You can only create plugin you add into the adequate folder.
like : filter, color picker, file format,...
-Each plugin has to stay on top ( you cannot do anything else in photoshop until the plugin is closed )
I've posted some note on the developer's blog you've given...
The must have for me ( and for ages ), is :
- large color picker but still open... ( even if it's CURRENT ONE !!... but it seems they can't do such simple features... )
- SIMPLE color swatches and tools management ( I mean with group, and better layout... )