Godwin's law, a quick recap for some...
mod
It came to my attention that my post in this thread:
"NAZIS!! NAZIS!! HITLER! NAZIS!
Damn MoP beat me to it =P"
Was missunderstood by some to mean something else. I was envoking Godwin's Law to bring an end to the bickering. I tried to go back and make the "NAZIS!! NAZIS!! HITLER! NAZIS!" a link to the explaination of Godwin's law but the thread was locked.
Hopefully this will keep anyone from calling me a naziscumhead in the future when I make referance to such things... I was also the "naziscumhead" that asked that the thread be locked. Please send future hate mail PM's to www.cramitinyourpiehole.org thanks, and have a good day
Godwin's Law (the version most people use)
"There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress."
"NAZIS!! NAZIS!! HITLER! NAZIS!
Damn MoP beat me to it =P"
Was missunderstood by some to mean something else. I was envoking Godwin's Law to bring an end to the bickering. I tried to go back and make the "NAZIS!! NAZIS!! HITLER! NAZIS!" a link to the explaination of Godwin's law but the thread was locked.
Hopefully this will keep anyone from calling me a naziscumhead in the future when I make referance to such things... I was also the "naziscumhead" that asked that the thread be locked. Please send future hate mail PM's to www.cramitinyourpiehole.org thanks, and have a good day
Godwin's Law (the version most people use)
"There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress."
Replies
[ QUOTE ]
Nevertheless, there is also a widely-recognized codicil that any intentional invocation of Godwin's law for its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful. See "Quirk's exception" belew.
[/ QUOTE ]