Well the reason why there was such a huge fuss about Janet's nipple was because it happened during prime time TV. Kids watch the Super Bowl, too.
Pornography can be "kept away" from kids. And we have laws against who can view/purchase them.
In short... Porn is controlled while Janet's nip wasn't.
The idea of topless booth babes is great, though. When I rule the world, all hot chicks will be forced to wear no clothing.
[ QUOTE ]
If by sad you mean really hot, then yes, it's tragic.
[/ QUOTE ]I don't even like the idea of 'booth babes'. This is even skuzzier than what we do. It's not that I don'tlike naked women, I do I really, really do. But what the hell does that have to do with the product? They're trying to take advantage of my raging libido to sucker me into buying some game or whatever. It's a little insulting.
[ QUOTE ]
They're trying to take advantage of my raging libido to sucker me into buying some game or whatever. It's a little insulting.
[/ QUOTE ]
I used to think I felt that way too, but then I realized I was just a recovering Catholic who was still shy about sex. Now that I'm older, I plainly, publicly admit that I love tits and don't care about the motivations of the source.
That's true, Mal, that people need to get over this fear of anything sexual. But these women are being objectified, and that's what's wrong.
But then I thought, yeah, but they chose to do this. So really, we can't say anything about them being objectified. Like, I'm all for women's rights and equality, but I'm also for choice. This is more or less easy money for the person. But very little is easy in this world without having a price. For this, maybe it's their dignity.
Oh, and Weiser. If someone can suckers a person into buying something through their libido, they deserved it, being unable to see through something that's so transparent. Not specifically you, but anyone.
Agree with you, Sundance. And Grindonit, what is the reason you added to your list of why you hate the US? Cause your second post kinda contradicted what I thought you meant.
The thing about petite girls with short hair is that they're hot! Well, the short hair thing, anyways.
[ QUOTE ]
your second post kinda contradicted what I thought you meant.
[/ QUOTE ]
well...the idea easily contradicts itself. rockstar mentioned that something like this should be done in the states. i disagree with that, simply because a woman's breast should not be used for advertising. they're used for the fact that sex sells, yet they're not a sex object. but that doesn't stop us americans from buying video games. you see, american men love breast and they love large breast. this is because american men are so ignorant that they require a measuring system for love. the bigger the breast, the bigger the love, even if surgically enhanced. it's degrading towards women, because now in america a woman doesn't have the right to expose her upper body. even breast feeding causes a conflict. breast feeding plays an important role in tranfering immunity to our young. so I'm agreeing with sundances first comment, hypocrits. in order to declare equal rights, all women should have the right to expose their bodies just as freely as men without serving time in jail. i live on the coast, and any woman over the age of 6 caught topless is fined. this is because of two ugly old women complaining to the local authorities that it was disgusting in front of children. if breast were disgusting, babies wouldn't suck on them for survival. basically, american men are big babies searching for their momma.
and I agree with soul, all women should be nude all the time. that would destroy all porn, all marketing, and sex crimes. all the perverts would crawl into their holes.
Ok. I understand what you meant. Wait, but aren't breasts a butt for the front? To be seen in missionary position, while the butt is seen from doggy position, like with monkeys? Used as a visual attractant, like the plume of a peacock? If so, then they are sex objects. But then, so are lips and hips and anything else that attracts and entices the opposite (or same) sex. Garg! I'm getting all confused! I do have another question for you, though. Do you consider genitalia sex objects?
I take back all the things I've written. I realize that there's more for me to think through, regarding this, and to be honest, I can't be arsed. This isn't a subject that I want to try and change the world's opinion on, so I'll just leave that to someone else. Eh, what can I say? I'm apathetic. I'll just keep working the way I want, and put my own morals and principles into the games that I design.
Okay I for one don't want all women naked. That would like ruin my eyes as the ones that shouldn't be naked are. Let Grandma and Big Bertha keep their cloths on.
But lets face it. If your heterosexual you have to admit these two girls are hot or attractive. Props go to these two girls for (A) not feel so damn insecure about their bodies. And (B) For just being hot.
MAH NIGGAH thats right, those two chicks rock, PLUS they're russian. All of this "discussion" about this is completely useless (I don't discourage people from posting, or including links to similar pictures , but there is really no higher meaning to anything, its just two almost naked chicks with paint on them acting as booth babes at the russian e3... please keep the moral debates out of this, not many people want to or care to hear about ur views.
explain to me why since you obviously have a knowledge of human muscles, tendons, ligaments, granular, and fat tissues. :P
don't answer. I'm just being a smart ass. I honestly think both women are ugly, and are only saved by their magazine cover figures. The bodypaint is terrible. A current member of our forum can do much better. And I don't know what the phuk they're advertising. Just a couple of whores off the streets perhaps looking to make a profit?
Okay, let's just straighten the line here, make sure everything is clearly crispy understood:
Russians girls = teh good.
Anyone, and I seriously mean anyone I know who have been with a russian girl would tell you right away: russians girls = teh good. It's in their genes.
If you're looking for dirty talk though, I wouldn't recommend it. (mr.Rockstar's mom is an exception)
MY MOM IS HAWT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ QUOTE ]
I just wish someone had taken the time to give the first one the paintjob she deserves.. I cringe at the crappy squiggles someone scrawled on her.
hmm that sounds dirty.
[/ QUOTE ]
oh i had to check the pics again i didn't notice the paint the first time around.
but seriously about the morale issue thats bollocks you are not selling your dignity for cash unless you are doing something you are ashamed of, is it so incomprehensible that a girl can be totaly comfortable with her body that she would not mind at all being nude in front of people?
Nvidia had body painted (topless, in thongs) women at their booth at SIGGRAPH 3 years ago. Day 1 they were topless, Day 2 they wore pasties, later in Day 2 they wore tank tops, Day 3 they were in jeans and tshirts.
Replies
john
so fucking awesome they should do this in the states...
[/ QUOTE ]
adds to list of reasons why I hate America.
everyone flies off the handle cos janet jackson tit pops out on national TV, yet they have a HUGE porn industry.
and they get so steamed about violent video games, yet they sell firearms in shops on the high street.
it's so f*&^ing idiotic...
Pornography can be "kept away" from kids. And we have laws against who can view/purchase them.
In short... Porn is controlled while Janet's nip wasn't.
The idea of topless booth babes is great, though. When I rule the world, all hot chicks will be forced to wear no clothing.
If by sad you mean really hot, then yes, it's tragic.
[/ QUOTE ]I don't even like the idea of 'booth babes'. This is even skuzzier than what we do. It's not that I don'tlike naked women, I do I really, really do. But what the hell does that have to do with the product? They're trying to take advantage of my raging libido to sucker me into buying some game or whatever. It's a little insulting.
They're trying to take advantage of my raging libido to sucker me into buying some game or whatever. It's a little insulting.
[/ QUOTE ]
I used to think I felt that way too, but then I realized I was just a recovering Catholic who was still shy about sex. Now that I'm older, I plainly, publicly admit that I love tits and don't care about the motivations of the source.
a nipple isn't porn. breast are not porn. a nude body is not porn. children are not frightened by breast, adults are. america is retarded.
[/ QUOTE ]
quoted for truth.
That's true, Mal, that people need to get over this fear of anything sexual. But these women are being objectified, and that's what's wrong.
But then I thought, yeah, but they chose to do this. So really, we can't say anything about them being objectified. Like, I'm all for women's rights and equality, but I'm also for choice. This is more or less easy money for the person. But very little is easy in this world without having a price. For this, maybe it's their dignity.
Oh, and Weiser. If someone can suckers a person into buying something through their libido, they deserved it, being unable to see through something that's so transparent. Not specifically you, but anyone.
Agree with you, Sundance. And Grindonit, what is the reason you added to your list of why you hate the US? Cause your second post kinda contradicted what I thought you meant.
The thing about petite girls with short hair is that they're hot! Well, the short hair thing, anyways.
Yes, I've just had that pointed out to me.
your second post kinda contradicted what I thought you meant.
[/ QUOTE ]
well...the idea easily contradicts itself. rockstar mentioned that something like this should be done in the states. i disagree with that, simply because a woman's breast should not be used for advertising. they're used for the fact that sex sells, yet they're not a sex object. but that doesn't stop us americans from buying video games. you see, american men love breast and they love large breast. this is because american men are so ignorant that they require a measuring system for love. the bigger the breast, the bigger the love, even if surgically enhanced. it's degrading towards women, because now in america a woman doesn't have the right to expose her upper body. even breast feeding causes a conflict. breast feeding plays an important role in tranfering immunity to our young. so I'm agreeing with sundances first comment, hypocrits. in order to declare equal rights, all women should have the right to expose their bodies just as freely as men without serving time in jail. i live on the coast, and any woman over the age of 6 caught topless is fined. this is because of two ugly old women complaining to the local authorities that it was disgusting in front of children. if breast were disgusting, babies wouldn't suck on them for survival. basically, american men are big babies searching for their momma.
and I agree with soul, all women should be nude all the time. that would destroy all porn, all marketing, and sex crimes. all the perverts would crawl into their holes.
there I'm done. now let's all go masturbate.
now let's all go masturbate.
[/ QUOTE ]
Smartest thing I've heard all day!
Ok. I understand what you meant. Wait, but aren't breasts a butt for the front? To be seen in missionary position, while the butt is seen from doggy position, like with monkeys? Used as a visual attractant, like the plume of a peacock? If so, then they are sex objects. But then, so are lips and hips and anything else that attracts and entices the opposite (or same) sex. Garg! I'm getting all confused! I do have another question for you, though. Do you consider genitalia sex objects?
But lets face it. If your heterosexual you have to admit these two girls are hot or attractive. Props go to these two girls for (A) not feel so damn insecure about their bodies. And (B) For just being hot.
hmm that sounds dirty.
The idea of topless booth babes is great, though. When I rule the world, all hot chicks will be forced to wear no clothing.
[/ QUOTE ]
but then their boobs get all saggy
but then their boobs get all saggy
[/ QUOTE ]
explain to me why since you obviously have a knowledge of human muscles, tendons, ligaments, granular, and fat tissues. :P
don't answer. I'm just being a smart ass. I honestly think both women are ugly, and are only saved by their magazine cover figures. The bodypaint is terrible. A current member of our forum can do much better. And I don't know what the phuk they're advertising. Just a couple of whores off the streets perhaps looking to make a profit?
then UH........get the fuck out. on lighter note, i love boobs! great post Rockstar! Dont hate, PROCREATE!
Russians girls = teh good.
Anyone, and I seriously mean anyone I know who have been with a russian girl would tell you right away: russians girls = teh good. It's in their genes.
If you're looking for dirty talk though, I wouldn't recommend it. (mr.Rockstar's mom is an exception)
Someones gotta do it.
I just wish someone had taken the time to give the first one the paintjob she deserves.. I cringe at the crappy squiggles someone scrawled on her.
hmm that sounds dirty.
[/ QUOTE ]
oh i had to check the pics again i didn't notice the paint the first time around.
but seriously about the morale issue thats bollocks you are not selling your dignity for cash unless you are doing something you are ashamed of, is it so incomprehensible that a girl can be totaly comfortable with her body that she would not mind at all being nude in front of people?
weak.