Home General Discussion

Non-Photorealistic camera

polycounter lvl 20
Offline / Send Message
bearkub polycounter lvl 20
http://www.photo.net/learn/technology/mflash/merl-non-photo.html


I saw this article on slashdot (surprise!) and figured it may be of interest to those that don't frequent the site. Here is a blurb from the article:

[ QUOTE ]
what does it do?

The multi-flash camera's non-photorealistic images look like line drawings, but have an advantage over hand made line drawings for they are able depict real-world scenes with precision and, most importanly, speed impossible for the human eye/hand. One may ask, why not use good ol' Photoshop filters to achieve these types of images? Multi-flash is able to detect variations and shape, while Photoshop filters are only able to translate variations and intensity of color. It does not produce intelligent stenciling like PhotoShop's posturization, but the results are similar and more successful.

Additionally, the multi-flash can detect shapes that an ordinary camera would not be able to replicate. For instance, a white shape on a white background would appear as a white plane if processed by a camera, or even the human eye. Multi-flash is able to detect depth discontinuities, through its four positions of flash, producing a line image of the white shape.

[/ QUOTE ]

Replies

  • adam
    Offline / Send Message
    adam polycounter lvl 19
    Hmm, seems interesting enough. But isn't anything a few Photoshop filters couldn't do (so it seems).
  • sonic
    Offline / Send Message
    sonic polycounter lvl 18
    [ QUOTE ]
    Hmm, seems interesting enough. But isn't anything a few Photoshop filters couldn't do (so it seems).

    [/ QUOTE ]

    [ QUOTE ]
    One may ask, why not use good ol' Photoshop filters to achieve these types of images? Multi-flash is able to detect variations and shape, while Photoshop filters are only able to translate variations and intensity of color. It does not produce intelligent stenciling like PhotoShop's posturization, but the results are similar and more successful.


    [/ QUOTE ]
  • MoP
    Offline / Send Message
    MoP polycounter lvl 18
    There's a thing we call "reading", Adam... useful sometimes, eh? smile.gif

    That does look pretty useful in some cases, and no doubt some mega-rich artist will get the technology before anyone else and produce some weird photos with it, and everyone will go "WOO!" then it will be forgotten in a year or so. Probably.
  • adam
    Offline / Send Message
    adam polycounter lvl 19
    Went through the page quickly while eating lunch - really just to see the images it produces and not the technology behind it. And MoP's probably right about it being forgotten.
  • ElysiumGX
    Offline / Send Message
    ElysiumGX polycounter lvl 18
    That's cool. I have a 20 or so step photoshop action that produces about the same effect, but obviously not as great considering the cameras abilities to detect shape.
  • Eric Chadwick
    This would be really cool if it worked along the lines of Ryan Clark's normal map photography technique...
    http://www.zarria.net/
Sign In or Register to comment.