TIME's Top 10 Games of 2004
1. The Sims 2
2. Rome: Total War
3. Half-Life 2
4. Katamari Damacy
5. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
6. Battlefield: Vietnam
7. Halo 2
8. Burnout 3: Takedown
9. Fable
10. Pirates!
Not sure I agree with the list but I worked on two of those. Not bad for my first year in the industry
(although, to be honest, I only spent two days doing production work on Sims 2)
Replies
what an interesting choice to say the least.
the order which they are in i dont completely agree with, but i own 7 of those 10 and love them.
D3 is better than at least 3/4 of those games listed
Other than that, a solid list though I would classify it as a 'Ten best games of 2004' rather than a 'Top ten games of 2004'
Between me and my flatmates, we own 7 of the 10 there. They are all enjoyable games.
I would have put HL2 above Rome TW though... and IMHO Call of Duty should be on there instead of BF:Vietnam (or did CoD come out in 2003, i can't remember)... Still a list of games worth having for sure though
1.Dead or Alive Ultimate
2.World of Warcraft
3.Katamari Damashii
4.Ninja Gaiden
5.Burnout 3
6.Grand Theft Auto San Andreas
7.Otogi 2
8.Sly Cooper 2 Band of Thieves
9.Metroid Prime 2
10.Prince of Persia 2 Warrior Within (most likely will make my top 10 once I get it on Wednesday)
Other notables being Front Mission 4, Phantom Brave, La Pucielle Tactics, Disgaea, Ghost Hunter, Fable, Gradius V, Metal Gear Solid 3, and Alien Hominid. Actually there are a few more. This has been a great year for video games. Can't wait to see what comes next.
This is a mag that routinely runs puff pieces like 'Are angels real?'
Excluding tuboy, if a polycounter posted a review on a game I'd give it much more weight that any other source.
How about Polycount's top x of 2004? By people who know,play & make games?
I dunno, I think World of warcraft should be up, I just went through a 3 hour straight long gaming session with it, that usually does not happen to me with MMORPGs, and I actaully want to go play it again. But I refuse to let myself get drawn into it completely, haha.
Scott
C'mon, guys. Doom III was pretty, but not very good, like Brittany Spears.
[/ QUOTE ]
Have you actually played it past the first few hours? It gets a lot better later on, and if you play it in a dark room you get adjusted to the darkness too, and it is actually possible to see where you go
Seriously, there is a lot of unjustified Doom3 bashing. It might not be 'the best game ever' tm (can't be, because Valve says HL2 is ), but it is better than most people say.
And the story... well it might be generic, but there IS at least one, which can not be said about 100% of the WW2 shooters out there (they just have a setting).
Sometimes I have the feeling people bash D3 because it doesn't run well on their year old, then very expensive, computers
This is an odd list though. Is Pirates even out yet?!
1. The Sims 2 - Awesome! Constantly playing on gf's PC.
2. Rome: Total War - Never heard of it. How'd it get here?
3. Half-Life 2 - Impressive! Immersive! Innovative! Released!
4. Katamari Damacy - Most original. Unique.
5. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas - LAME! 3 was enough, give it a rest.
6. Battlefield: Vietnam - Needed to be done. Too many WWII ripoffs.
7. Halo 2 - Good. But not great.
8. Burnout 3: Takedown - Highly addictive, fun racing experience. Great sense of speed. Better than NFS: Underground.
9. Fable - Disappointing. But OK.
10. Pirates! - Innovative use of several game platforms. Looks fun. Released?
...
25. Doom3 - Dark, Scary, Sluggish, Ugly, Predictable, Limited, Ebay.
Doom3's not on the SpikeTV GOTY awards either, LAME
[/ QUOTE ]The only thing lame about the SpikeTV GOTY awards is the SpikeTV GOTY awards I'm not even gonna watch after what I bare witness to last year.
i played doom3 ... the more i plyed it the worse it got
[/ QUOTE ]
Me too. I started off pleased with D3, then quit after I realized I'd "gotten the idea" two hours earlier. Once it got into its very narrow groove, it never wriggled into anything else.
I'm glad to see Rome: Total War on that list! It's not weird enough to be a niche game, at least not compared to the previous installments in the series, none of which I'd expect to get sales from any but the semi- and completely-hardcore, but I'm still surprised it showed up in a non-game industry magazine. Hmm, if it weren't 4:30, I'd like to go play right now ...
It was: Dark, Scary, Sluggish, Ugly with its own sense of beauty, sometimes Predictable, and lots of fun!
Maybe I liked it because it is very close combat, since I absolutly hate those 'open field' shooters, where you can't take cover or strafe behind the next wall, or maybe because it was 'old school' gameplay...
Oh and those
[ QUOTE ]
i mean when it gets to where every baddie leaps out of secret walls, then the designers are not even trying
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it was sometimes annoying, but it keept you on the 'edge', and or course it made Doo3 more similar to Doom1, which it was supposed to be a remake of
I'm still playing and developing stuff for Quake 3...
I'm still playing and developing stuff for Quake 3...
[/ QUOTE ]
Not the worst choice, since I bet that Q3 editing will get a big boost as soon as it gets open-source at the end of this year
Doom 3 should definitely be there... right where battlefield vietnam is... WTF is that doing there anyway? I mean D3 wasn't super original and didn't have the nonstop addicting waste of time gameplay like sims 2, but it was very good while it lasted, it should be there.
Fable shouldn't be in the top 10, its not that good of a game, if you're looking for an RPG then at least put in Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines. I also think World of Warcraft deserves a mention, I'd put that instead of fable.
And why is Pirates! #10? is it that good??? Has anyone here even played it?
john