Home Technical Talk

Can't figure out normal map error

So I've been stuck with this really awful normal map error for a while now and I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm using Maya to model, xnormal to bake, and Quixel to texture. I double checked and there's no ngons on anything. I've tried multiple solutions I found here and nothing works. I even remodeled the pieces and it still looks bad. Any idea what's going on?

Replies

  • Fabi_G
    Online / Send Message
    Fabi_G high dynamic range
    Hi! Could you share the meshes?

    Does the same issue occur when baking just one element?

    Is this a game asset? Low resolution per element probably doesn't help too. Since there are many repeating elements, part of the texture could be reused allowing for higher resolution. A measure to to reduce aliasing showing at seams would be to straighten UV strips.
  • seasprout
    I do still have some artifacts when only baking a single object. It's meant to be used as a game asset. Should I stack the uvs instead? Would that help?

  • gnoop
    Offline / Send Message
    gnoop sublime tool
    It's  projection distances issue . Ropes and  neighbor disk being projected on each other .  If the last screen and  UV are low res for a game  it's insanely hi res  for a game.  Lots of redundant geometry.     As  Fabi_G said  you need unique UV  only  if you really need  unique AO  for this thing  . Could be 2-3  unique disks only.   Plus the whole thing doesn't need to be baked  really.    You just need something tilable for the ropes  .  And paint holes in those disks + rounding corners shader  for the planks . 

    But since you already wasted lots of time for baking setup  just decrease projection distances  and split  hires to parts   so you can make matching low/hi res pairs  the way such disk could "see" only hires disk  and not the ropes  for normals , and the whole hi res thing for unique AO  if you need it.    Also Xnormal  is a bit outdated  baker  although I haven't used it for years so maybe I am wrong.   
  • Fabi_G
    Online / Send Message
    Fabi_G high dynamic range
    Yes, stacking UVs, means you end up having less unique UV shells and can scale the remaining ones, so they have more resolution. You could have a couple of variants of an element to avoid repetition. Further variation can be added with some masks on top, either texture or vertex colour. A checker texture can be used to evaluate if the resolution holds up when viewed in game from the intended distance (texel density).

    With this specific asset, you can probably save/optimize a lot by simply mapping UVs to tiling trims for the ropes and the wood. Individual elements can be duplicated/instanced. Break down the subject into chunks/modules, create a construction kit (modules, trims, tiling textures), then use that to build your large real-time asset. 

    I don`t know if xNormal has a match by name/bake group functionality, else you would have to explode meshes (move them apart from each other) for the bake, so they don`t project onto each other. Personally, I switched mainly to Painter and Toolbag for baking, both offering match by name/bake groups, which is a huge relief. Maybe you get a trial to test it for yourself.
  • gnoop
    Offline / Send Message
    gnoop sublime tool
     IMO the only thing that  really needs baking here is  that small knot connecting ropes  but not into current model bit rather  just some octahedron.  



Sign In or Register to comment.