Displacement Mystery / Arnold and Octane differences
I've been trying to reproduce a displacement effect on cubes for a cloner plataform that I've seen.
But after trying out and tinkering with every option avaliable on Arnold, I didn't came close to the details being so perfectly extruded and shaped.
Here's my settings on Arnold and the file overall with them applied:
Do I need to push iterations for the 10+ level and have a computer that has Threadripper and infinite memory or I'm doing something wrong?
Why the Octane example goes for the right look without changing many attributes?
But after trying out and tinkering with every option avaliable on Arnold, I didn't came close to the details being so perfectly extruded and shaped.
Here's my settings on Arnold and the file overall with them applied:
Do I need to push iterations for the 10+ level and have a computer that has Threadripper and infinite memory or I'm doing something wrong?
Why the Octane example goes for the right look without changing many attributes?
Replies
Could you post a side by side image. Showing the same framing.
I've read in reddit that Octane works different with displacement and maybe that's why I'm not getting the correct look.
The solution was not using such a small cube (20x20cm) and using a lot of segments (50 on xyz) on a bigger cube.
5 iterations is fine.