haha well i based this on a 3d scan of a womans head, so if it's out, then the womans head is out. :P
That does make me think about what is a better way to make a reference like this. Idealized proportions of the face, or something actually based on a single real sample point?
Well, what I mean is that if you were to add 3d glasses to this 3d head, the branches would end up floating above the graphic representation of the ear. The 3d scan could also have been confused by the undercuts and overall complexity of the human ear ...
It is without a doubt a very subtle thing, depending on relative factors which themselves vary across individuals. Glad to see that the glasses check turned out to be helpful !
Replies
I updated it to match ron lemens version closer after some feedback and studies using it.
Ear placement tip : the head needs to be able to wear glasses
That does make me think about what is a better way to make a reference like this. Idealized proportions of the face, or something actually based on a single real sample point?
Thanks though!
example : http://waverleyeyecare.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1200X350-6739625-woman.png
And of course the refraction through the lenses could very well affect the perception of eye placement too !
Could you do a quick Photoshop to show what you mean? Sorry i think I'm being a bit dense here .
EDIT: ah i think i know what it is,
I think it's just that the eyeballs are a lil too high, not that the ears are too low.
I'll post some of mine tonight.