My first game-ready weapon: Judge Dredd Lawgiver

AviKohl3D

Tools: Maya, Photoshop, xNormal

[SKETCHFAB]0b6352ece1e5460aa9d84c44c7b7ac5e[/SKETCHFAB]

RobeOmega

You have lots of poly's which are unneeded in your low poly also lots of things in your texture maps could be overlapped together

luge

definitely see some edges that could have been removed to reduce the tris in areas that do not deform. also, you're textures are a tad on the boring side. your normals for the paint on the gun are pretty strong. there also appears to be a shading error here:

also, just a question, nothing wrong with it... but, if both sides are exactly the same in your texture, then why uv both sides when you can just uv one side and mirror it over so you have more texture space as well.

RobeOmega

Sorry this is a bit later it took me a few min to make it.


1) This could be a quarter of the size it currently is
2) These two could be combined
3) This could be half the size vertically
4) This could be cut in half vertically
5) Same as 3
6) Same as 4
7) Same as 4
8 ) Could be in half horizontally
9) Could be in half vertically
10) These can be combined in their respective group
11) Cut in half vertically again
12) Vertically again
13) Annnnnnd vertically again

RobeOmega

"if both sides are exactly the same in your texture, then why uv both sides when you can just uv one side and mirror it over so you have more texture space as well"

Don't worry I got this >: )

luge

don't get what you mean? O_o i was just curious why he chose to do what he did O_o

RobeOmega

Don't get what?

luge

why you quoted me and said "Don't worry I got this >:)" I don't get why you quoted my question.

edit: nevermind, thought about it... lack of sleep took me a few...

you were just giving him suggestions on how to make it efficient while keeping the symmetrical sides uved seperately. I'd still suggest uving one and then mirroring it over, its much more efficient.

Ediited again: just realized fully... yeah, now I get exactly what you were referring to, I thought you meant cutting the size, I was thinking that would be terrible because of stretched uvs. but I see that you mean to cut into a seperate shell. but it would be easier to just remove one half entirely (aside from cylindrical objects) and then mirror over.

AviKohl3D

Wow! Thanks a lot for the expert feedback. Honestly never considered that symmetrical UVs can be overlapped.

luge

they can only be uved for texture, not in lightmap.

aaronkaminer

I think its looks pretty good for a 1st game model. You definately have some extra polygons you could have gotten rid of. And... yes... for a clean model like yours.. you can mirror the model and have more texture space.. but a lot of times it is also a good idea to map it as you did... esp is you plan to add unique details.. like wear and tear.. or decals. (stickers...etc.) you could work with multiple uv sets and achieve the same result.. either way.. also worth noting.. if you mirrow the mesh, you will have to create a 2nd uv set if you plan to use the model with light mapping. Reason: you can not/should not have overlapping uv shells when baking light maps or you will get wild results. Nice job so far! Keep it up!

luge

^I'd say its good practice to always have 2 uv sets/channels. but thats my opinion.

AviKohl3D

luge wrote: »

they can only be uved for texture, not in lightmap.

You mean you don't overlap UVs for normal maps?

luge

no, when the uv set for your textures can be overlapped if its going to be the same on both sides, but when it comes to your baked lightmap (this will be in engine, primarily UE3/UE4), this will be your second uv set that you have to make, this one can not overlap. if it does, you will get light artifacting and unnatural and repeating lights on both sides of your gun.