Photoshop non destructive layer mask?
polycount sponsor
I often find I have to do operations to my layer masks, ideally I would just use a smart object for the layer mask, but this doesn't appear to be possible.
Right now I am making a smart object with my non destructive edits in it and then duplicating it then rasterizing it and then using the result so I can always go back. And I just realized you don't need to rasterize the smart object just copy and paste it which helps.
Anyone got a better solution?
Right now I am making a smart object with my non destructive edits in it and then duplicating it then rasterizing it and then using the result so I can always go back. And I just realized you don't need to rasterize the smart object just copy and paste it which helps.
Anyone got a better solution?
Replies
or did i get something wrong?
its the same method as below but instead of text you use smart object.
http://www.shutterstock.com/newsletter/205/Using_a_Clipping_Mask_in_Photoshop_Fast_and_Easy-2.html
after you do that, you can load selection of the main image and apply it as the layer mask of the smart object to completely mask out the image.
you can still change smart object anytime but only draw back is if you move around the main image then u have to update the layer mask manually.
But we all know that Adobe are more interested in adding YET ANOTHER slider in Lightroom for all the photographers out there, rather than actually developing things that us game developers would want.
Yeah - and Substance isn't "Photoshop".
Having something like it in Photoshop though that would be GOLDEN
It also doesn't help that A) No one ever asked Adobe for such a thing, and
Yes and no, but simply put, Substance is nowhere as intuitive as one might hope.
The node system is very strange, it doesn't use the same functions as those of standard HLSL shaders (EI: there is no such thing as Mutiply, you have to look for a Blend node, access its properties and change it to Mutiply manually) so it can bring people to a crawl for those who has shader knowledge and know what node does what.
It also doesn't help that it doesn't use texture uniform names like those found in GIMP or PS, and alot of the functions which would be easily usable through the use of simple set of numbers, which dictate opacity and such, need to be fed through magical portals before being fed into the node that tells you how much X should be desaturated by, so people who use Photoshop alot will find the constant accessing of this or that, or having to run nodes through nodes to get a single constant to be problematic.
Simply put, we currently don't have anything like that at all. Photoshop lacks the people to implement the solution, and Subtance has too much of learning curve that doesn't fit with already implemented pipelines in an intuitive way.
I recall someone long ago made such tool, it was essentially a shader editor for 2D textures that allowed you to save them out, but the author abandoned it because no one was buying it and he couldn't afford to keep on working in it. It didn't have any texturing editing tools, and was pretty bare I recall.