Mystique model

MJDavinci

Hello !!!

guys I need to know what you think of my model so that I can improve it
and BTW the model is not completed yet

MeintevdS

What's up with the extreme normals on the face and boobs. I suggest you lose the normal map until you've finished the body itself. The normal map hides any kind of shapes you've got going on in the face and makes it impossible to comment on.

mrfryday

Definitely finish the model without textures first. The face and the boobs still need a lot of work! On first glance i would say that the forearms are too short and the neck is too thick...

JGcount

Looks like there is still a lot of anatomy you need to study before even thinking about making a normal map.

It is always nice to learn the basics first.

PaulP

Mystique is basically naked, it is very important to perfect her anatomy before going any further. Take a few steps back and show her without the extra definition, and it'l be easier to see what needs fixing. One step at a time.

AlexCatMasterSupreme

lol

jmt

Is your normal map inverted or something? It looks very strange, especially on the face/chest/hair.

Before doing any sort of high poly normal map/bake work you should really get your basic anatomy down, though. The face especially needs work. It's hard to give good critiques from the images you've shown.

Snader

Kind of offtopic, but why is it that when a viewport screenshot uses weirdly scaled pixels, 9 times out of 10 it is in maya?

jmt

Snader wrote: »

Kind of offtopic, but why is it that when a viewport screenshot uses weirdly scaled pixels, 9 times out of 10 it is in maya?

Maybe because they teach Maya in a lot of schools?

JoshWilkinson

jmt wrote: »

Maybe because they teach Maya in a lot of schools?

i lol'd. smartass.

MJDavinci

thank you guys. I'll work on everything mentioned above
appreciate your helps