in the process of priceing out parts for a new comptuer build and am trying to figure out what i would get the biggest gain from right now, maxing my mobo out and 32gb, but of a slower ram to keep the cost down, or getting just 16gb of something that clocks faster?
i can go up to 2133mhz on the 16gb, or 1600mhz for 32gb, and still stay within my price range.
Replies
The difference between 2133 and 1600mhz in very high ram bandwidth usage programs like Zbrush, Photoshop and Mari will be in the order of 4-5%, in most everything else the cpu will become the bottleneck and the performance will be identical (3ds max, xsi, modo, 3dcoat).
-Are they both 1.5V? I believe this is fairly important for stability and overclocking.
-Did you check out Intel's list of approved RAM for your processor? I'm a huge proponent of stability over speed & hiccups. Last I check, the i5 2005K for example doesn't actually support over 1333mhz natively. You have to go into BIOS and overclock to anything 1600+. I believe this doesn't void your warranty, and is "supported" by Intel.
-Whats the timing (CAS Lag) on both? I'm assuming there is a tradeoff (higher frequency and lower timing on one, and lower frequency and higher timing on the other). Which is better is highly technical and debatable.
-Heat spreaders are going to be important for either. Make sure they come with them. I the same vein, if you're getting an aftermarket CPU cooler, make sure you're going to have space for both the ram and cpu heatsinks.
If all's fair and good, my suggestion would be the 2133mhz 16gb. This should be ample to run Max, Photoshop, UDK, and whatever else you want at the same time. Also, you can always double up on that ram in 6-12 months if you feel you need it.
The real question is whether or not you're getting a SSD?!
and im intending on using it with a Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge
That's a beast of a CPU, so you'd better be planning on OC'ing it with a good cooler!
so it seem 1600 is best with good timeing land latency