Haha, but about the model, I kind of think the photosourced texture is all that ties this in to Will Smith. I don't think the facial features particularly are exaggerations of his own; save for the ears and the mouth.
The cheekbones, and the distance between the eyes only hurt it, in my opinion. His cheekbones aren't really that strong a facial feature for him, I don't think. In fact, I think he is a hard person to make a caricature of, just because he is distinctive, but doesn't have many particularly unique or large features.
See this picture:
He's a pretty smooth visage.
Check out this, for example. It has its faults as well, no doubt, but different faults than yours:
And above all, work on likeness without the texture. I'd quite like to see it without the texture, because, like I said, I don't think I'd recognize who it is meant to represent.
Replies
LOL
did Low poly version
The deaf one? No, this looks nothing like her.
Haha, but about the model, I kind of think the photosourced texture is all that ties this in to Will Smith. I don't think the facial features particularly are exaggerations of his own; save for the ears and the mouth.
The cheekbones, and the distance between the eyes only hurt it, in my opinion. His cheekbones aren't really that strong a facial feature for him, I don't think. In fact, I think he is a hard person to make a caricature of, just because he is distinctive, but doesn't have many particularly unique or large features.
See this picture:
He's a pretty smooth visage.
Check out this, for example. It has its faults as well, no doubt, but different faults than yours:
And above all, work on likeness without the texture. I'd quite like to see it without the texture, because, like I said, I don't think I'd recognize who it is meant to represent.