If I were you, I'd widen the shoulders- just to accentuate the fit peasantness of her. Of course, that could screw with the femininity of her, so it may not be the best choice; though I imagine a fit peasant to be less than the epitome of the female form.
What is she fit from doing? Does she farm?
Knowing the back story can really help with anatomy. The body parts she uses most often will be more muscular-
Hm, actually, could you post a side view, as well?
shoulders already wide enough, widening them more would make her look like man with boobs.
besides, peasants can be pretty too!
good job so far can we get a closeup on the face? and butt too, plx.
shoulders already wide enough, widening them more would make her look like man with boobs.
besides, peasants can be pretty too!
good job so far can we get a closeup on the face? and butt too, plx.
lovely... nothing to add but drool. I really wish I had something to crit but you're not doing much of anything wrong in my book...
I love the flow in the legs, it might not be anatomically prefect (people are weird it actually is well within reason) but damn do they flow really well like an old Greek statue.
Lol i'm not usually one to join on board with the love it train immediately but seriously, it's awesome...wish i could say something bad, mess up and post again
Yeah, it is beautiful. My point, of course, was that is just doesn't scream "peasant!" to me.
Also, she's going to have a gun? I'm just confused. Peasants with guns... When is she from?
I was thinking a medieval peasant- clearly this isn't one of those.
Would love some more info.
Regardless, a side view, specifically of the head, would be lovely. Thanks.
And, while I hate to crit this, the clavicles look like a bit too "out there", like this:
She's wearing a device that physically pushes up her clavicles. It's hard to find ones that natural stand out that much. In fact, I couldn't in google images. It could be the lighting in your image, but I think they should be softened a bit, regardless.
Maybe just not define the ribs that much at all? She is not stretching like that.
Maybe wide the top of her back, under the arm, that latissimus dorsi tapers into the arm, now her back is as slim as her rib cage, giving the shoulders a detached look (it's kinda common though)
Slightly longer deltoids on the back side of the arm
fingers look a bit small
Some great suggestions, thanks. She'll ultimately be clothed, just wanted to try my hand at a female nude. Hopefully, the image there shows off the clavicles better. Psyk0, awesome specifics, I'm on it.
In this day and age of rampant multi-phallus creatures, I didn't think a peasant with a gun would be so problematic!
hey Kip, great stuff man, love the anatomy, the soulders look a little seperate from the torso for me, like the pectorial isn't connecting properly with the arm.....if that makes sense....oddly my fav part is the calves, I love the curves that you have going on there.
I think that the ear may be a bit high or too far back, could be the perspective too cos it just looks off in the 3/4 view.
Made some alterations, especially around the ribcage/latissimus dorsi (hopefully pushed out enough), with quick color thrown on:
Also the start to the clothing:
Hmmm...if you want to make her look a bit more feminine, you should give a fair smoothing out to the area between her eyebrows! in fact, smooth the whole topology around the eyebrows, they're too prominent for a delicate peasant girl!
Sculpt looks pretty decent but that gun doesn't belong at all. Peasants should have wooden and basic weapons. Staff, cane, bow and arrow maybe but not a high-tech sniper rifle.
All right, it seems as though what some of you are looking for is a back story.
Its the 17th century, Rikke Kjærsgaard is your typical Copenhagen house servant: cooking, cleaning, sewing, hauling 50kg sacks of hops, etc. (sack-hauling=well-toned physique). One afternoon shes returning from the market. As she turns onto Forhabningsholms Alle, she passes by a bakery which has a freak wienerbrød explosion. Said event cracks open a pint-sized singularity, sending her hurtling in time and space to 2039, post-apocalyptic Ecuador. She hooks up with the resistance, trying to reclaim the country from the mutant llamas which have taken over. It turns out that shes a pretty fair sniper, her pinpoint accuracy a natural by-product from a lifetime of needle-threading and precision herring filleting.
The blue of her shirt reads more like leather than cloth. Toning it down some might help mitigate that some down on her shirt some. Same goes for her skirt, especially the red area
On the character I'd say that you might want to darken the eyebrows a shade, they're so light now that you can barely see them, and I feel it's detracting from the character. I almost didn't notice them at first. It's kinda creepy in my opinion.
She looks like an angry swedish woman. a lot of swedish women do not have very dark eyebrows and when coupled with an intense brow line it IS quite terrifying to talk to them. So...I'd have to say it's spot on.
Replies
What is she fit from doing? Does she farm?
Knowing the back story can really help with anatomy. The body parts she uses most often will be more muscular-
Hm, actually, could you post a side view, as well?
besides, peasants can be pretty too!
good job so far can we get a closeup on the face? and butt too, plx.
Ahaha, bum-shots are a must.
I love the flow in the legs, it might not be anatomically prefect (people are weird it actually is well within reason) but damn do they flow really well like an old Greek statue.
Also, she's going to have a gun? I'm just confused. Peasants with guns... When is she from?
I was thinking a medieval peasant- clearly this isn't one of those.
Would love some more info.
Regardless, a side view, specifically of the head, would be lovely. Thanks.
And, while I hate to crit this, the clavicles look like a bit too "out there", like this:
She's wearing a device that physically pushes up her clavicles. It's hard to find ones that natural stand out that much. In fact, I couldn't in google images. It could be the lighting in your image, but I think they should be softened a bit, regardless.
But beyond that, it's really very lovely.
-Ribcage could have more of an inverted V shape at the top, looks too round near the sternum:
Warning this link contains nudity
-Knee caps a bit stretched vertically
-When seen from the back, the latissimus dorsi could have a slight curve (outwards) instead of being straight.
Maybe wide the top of her back, under the arm, that latissimus dorsi tapers into the arm, now her back is as slim as her rib cage, giving the shoulders a detached look (it's kinda common though)
Slightly longer deltoids on the back side of the arm
fingers look a bit small
hot legs
Some great suggestions, thanks. She'll ultimately be clothed, just wanted to try my hand at a female nude. Hopefully, the image there shows off the clavicles better. Psyk0, awesome specifics, I'm on it.
In this day and age of rampant multi-phallus creatures, I didn't think a peasant with a gun would be so problematic!
Great boobs!
I think that the ear may be a bit high or too far back, could be the perspective too cos it just looks off in the 3/4 view.
looking forward to seeing where you go with this.
Also the start to the clothing:
Both look great. Nice work
wtf...
Great idea! I love it! :poly124:
i was like. nice... nice... ok... nice... wtf???
lol
It’s the 17th century, Rikke Kj
Peasants with guns, whats not to like.
but asking 'why not?'
gogo man
GOTY 2012 for sure. I love it
LOL
You spent all that time sculpting her legs and ass and it's completely hidden under the dress!
http://www.ezracove.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/portfolio/gun3.jpg
SOLUTION!?
Make this badasswin with a periscope off the eyepiece of scope!