It depends what you're referring to... and what you're doing. I'm assuming you mean it's faster to develop in the flash IDE. I disagree. I use to develop in flash, but I bet if I were to try make an object do something simple, like make an object move across the container, it would still take me longer than what I could do…
You mean like ChromeOS? Not much of a prediction there ;) HTML 5 has practically replaced flash already. Youtube already uses it, along with most other popular video sites. The only thing left using it for video, are banner ads, and even they have been changing. Javasript/jQuery can pretty much cover the interactive stuff…
Well, and again, I 'think' that's what Adobe is trying to do with Flex. I haven't played with Flex yet though, so I'm not sure overall what it will do/provide. I didn't mean for my statement to sound like a blanket 'jquery will replace flash' statement. I'm just saying, I think there may be enough tools now (in general),…
absolutely not making that as a blanket statement at all. clearly it's a case by case basis. my point is simply targeted at that sentiment ' htmlCssJavascript can do everything flash can so let's dump flash ' your example is a good one to highlight where something simple can ( and perhaps should ) be done with jQuery.…