I wonder where that artist vs craftsman BS came from. Why do people bother splitting hairs? You do it or you dont. I want to see a picture of the winning flower thingie. And, boobs.
That's the thing, I couldn't find a single person who actually liked the flower better. I realize fractal art is rather niche, and while the current debate is a result of something which involved it, the debate isn't truly about it. Honestly, compared to some of the other artists at the show, I was one of the least…
art judging is subjective. honestly I'd love to see the piece you lost to, as I think if you want to know "why" people didn't like your work compared to a half-assed flower, nobody here is going to be able to offer their opinion without comparing them. For what its worth, few fractal images actually excite me, and yours is…
Well, dude, what im getting at is that if the average person looks at your art vs some shitty flower and likes the flower more, maybe you should re-evaluate your work. You obviously aren't making art only for yourself, since you enter it in competitions, so... Why does your work need to be explained to be justifiable? I'm…
It's more than likely that the judges are traditionalists. Or judge. The names never were released. For all I know, it could have been a blind hermit. The piece I lost to isn't online, sadly. All it was, was a photo of a flower set in front of a window, with the color of the petals changed. I might be able to get in…
After a slightly disappointing local artshow (categories were too broad, judges were on drugs, this lost to a half-assed, color-shifted flower) a topic that arose among those of us who were cleaning up afterwards, was if the scope or the technical proficiency of an art submission mattered more. I figured I'd bring that…