Search
-
Re: Game Success vs. Art Quality
Sad to say, but game success is rarely ever linked to artistic quality. Sure, good art usually doesn't hurt a game's chances. But it is definitely not the deciding feature. I think the real areas to look at are mechanics, replayability, fun factor, polish, and marketing. I personally hate marketing, and all that it stands… -
Game Success vs. Art Quality
As game artists, how significant is a product's commercial success when it comes to an artist's portfolio or even word of mouth? There are plenty of games that ship and are very successful even if the visuals suck, and those with amazing visuals but game-play worthy of an immediate bargain bin. I would imagine that the… -
Re: Game Success vs. Art Quality
As far as I can tell the most successful games have above par graphics and terrible gameplay. The majority of titles in the top 10 are still using a mechanic that is basically akin to running around with a giant cone attached to your head, the tip of which interacts with your environment! Most innovation is rewarded with… -
Re: Game Success vs. Art Quality
I think WHO you know is more important than your titles (in terms or high profile or not) in most cases, Sending your shit to someone on the inside has a wayyyyyy better chance of getting you an interview and job because you have people pushing for you inside the studio. Obviously HR looks for experience 1st so having a… -
Re: Game Success vs. Art Quality
Yeah, its all about the fan base, an artist from infinity ward has a better chance at being noticed for his work than someone from Hello Kitty. Simply because of the fanbase, teens, fathers, parents, everyone plays cod. Childrens games will only recieve recognition by the children and not from a standpoint of artistic…
5 results