But see, thats the same reasoning the other side used. Taking one item of context to equal the whole. (IE violence in school observed , violent games at home therefore violent games caused the event. crime rate lowered, violent games at home therefore violent games not cause of event. They both are flawed as they do not…
Your idealism is commendable. But there is very little room in modern media for this manner of approach. Penn and Teller's show is not there to educate, or push an agenda. (You'll notice that they mocked gamers as well as the anti-gaming crowd) The function of their program is to entertain, and they focus exclusively on…
The football example? I'm not so sure. People do, in fact, have a part of themselves that is prone to violence, domination, and looking awesome while you're doing it.. but we need to understand what the NEED is here if we're going to say anything intelligent about it at all if you look at it, I would argue, the need here…