Search

1. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by EarthQuake · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   Do people really need mudbox tutorials? Really isnt that the point, its super simple to use? I can understand why people would want ZB tutorials, because that shit is from the moon. But mud is like, just open it up and work, is there anything more to it than that?

2. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by scourgewarper · Jun 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   Pillar tutorial 10/10, my 2 cents is regardless of which app you use (zbrush imo) if possible could you go into more depth how exactly you create the appearance of crumbling, rocky type damage if indeed you cover this is in your next tutorial. Just found it difficult for my pillar not to end up like soft melted chocolate!…

3. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by MikeF · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   i loved your pillar tutorial. So Mudbox has my vote

4. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by Jeremy Lindstrom · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   Mudbox, the market is already flooded with zbrush tutorials. Mudbox needs some loving.

5. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by Jeremy Wright · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   Mudbox. There's a ton of Zbrush videos out there already. We need quality Mudbox videos where the instructor has prepared in advance for the tutorial he's presenting.

6. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by Justin Meisse · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   I you could do the pillar tutorial with zbrush, it's basically just using noisy brushes to take chunks out of the pillar and generally ding things up.

7. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by Andreas · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   I was gonna say this. Although I wouldn't have misspelled rubble. Pixologic have been releasing tons of video tutorials for free, yours would want to offer something pretty spectacular to sell...maybe Mudbox would be better?

8. Re: Mudbox 2009 or zBrush 3.1 in an upcoming eat3d video

   

   Reply by Irreal · Apr 2009 · Home› General Discussion

   Hey Riki, I voted zbrush but I really don't think the focus should be on a particular package. Each package has it's own little quirks but it comes down to technique at the end which is transferable between the two as you well know. It would be interesting to see each package used to create the asset and then you are…