Taehoons was fucking CRAZY i totally agree number 10 i was eh on, thought there were some that deserved to be in top 10 that were definitely better.. oh well :\
How about each site votes on the top 20 everybody on that site gets to vote. Then that gets dropped to 10 by the people who got the top 20 spots. We wouldn't let anyone know who placed where only who made it to the top 10. That info would come out once all the judges votes were in. If they are good enough to get in the top…
come on guys .. the point system was explained bevore 1. place 10pt -> 10. place 1 pt so: 3dtotal 10 + 7 + 5 = 22 pt polycount 8 + 6 + 2 = 16 pt cgchat 9 pt cgsociety 4 + 3 + 1 = 8 pt edit: this doesn´t explains how a specific entry gets it´s place and i don´t say i like this system
Congrats to the winners. Definitely a few in there that I didn't think would make the top 10. And some that aren't in there I thought should have been (re: Vahls!)... Oh well, next year!
Yeah, I agree that makes more sense than team bests. Having a top 20 instead of a top 10 and eliminating the team bests would probably lead to more feeling of accomplishment for more participants.
I like the suggestion of ranking each submission through a grading system. Say have 5 categories with a ranking of 1 to 10 or something along those lines. Then at least people can see how they ranked compared to other submissions. Just my opinion though
I can't believe Spacemonkey, Spark, and Paultosca were so overlooked. I think their pieces clearly outrank some of the other top 10. There were many other great pieces too. But like it's been stated, we should respect the judges decisions and it was some pretty tight competition.
well the actual point system for the top 10 needs tweaking... and i'm sure fred will be up to the task of making it good. As far as community judges, i think that might not be the best idea, at least as long as there are enough people from outside either forum doing the judging so they can make impartial decisions.