[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You want to walk to burn fat, not run. You have to reach your target heart rate, and running will go way over that. [/ QUOTE ] So if you run, you won't lose fat? Okay, say I do some interval sprinting for 20 minutes, which raises my metabolism for hours. What is my body using for fuel? And…
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You want to walk to burn fat, not run. You have to reach your target heart rate, and running will go way over that. [/ QUOTE ] So if you run, you won't lose fat? Okay, say I do some interval sprinting for 20 minutes, which raises my metabolism for hours. What is my body using for…
[ QUOTE ] Complement with weights but make cardio your main focus. 60mins on the bike burns a lot of calories [/ QUOTE ] Without starting the old arguments, I'll just say that this isn't the right way to go. 60 minutes of low intensity cardio might burn 400 calories or so, but it has no long-term metabolic effect. You'd do…
500 is very hard. I worked down to it over the course of about 5 months (starting at 1400), and I was very weak every day. I would sleep extra. I usually felt cold and I was occasionally disoriented. I don't think there is any real reason to go that low. I was obsessively trying to keep my weight loss around 4 lbs. a week…
Seriously though dude, if you really want to lose weight that bad you really can starve yourself. If you cut back to 400-500 calories a day and even attempt to have a normal life (which won't be easy, due to lack of energy, chills, muddled thinking) you will lose weight. I have heard a lot of health nuts talk about putting…
AOEA: You must be one of the functionally illiterate. I say, you CAN cut your calories that low, and you will lose weight. That is simply a statement of fact. If that sentence included words like "should", "ought", or "best" then you could say I was suggesting a course of action. Let me give you an example, "AOEA really…