Hey, somewhat of a rant, but I'm interested in hearing some of the opinions from people on here. I recently watched a movie called "Elephant" with my girlfriend. It was recommended by a buddy of mine, who is one of those people who tends to like to really act up the artist persona, so I knew it'd be an "artistic" film. I'm…
your entire argument is based on the self-stated absolute that this film is not artistic, and are therefor right to be annoyed by people's response to it. All it takes is for ONE person to respond that it IS artistic, and the whole hideous cycle of pointless monging on about what constitutes art and blah di fucking blah…
I've got no beef with calling anything you want art, there's really no point in arguing about it cause people can mean VASTLY different things by "art". However,"art" aside I thought "Elephant" was one of the worst non-movies I've ever seen. Its like someone carried a camera around for part of a day and didn't realize it…
[ QUOTE ] The only way you can say you enjoyed it is if you are trying to prove you are "artistic". [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I find that a good deal of these indie films are all hype and considered "artistic" by a bunch of pretentious farttards that think any movie with a budget higher than a couple thousand bucks is crap. [/…
Saw it with no expectations, was caught into it right from the start. I don't think this movie is really about esthetics anyways ahem. And I didn't see any artsy vibe in it either... What version are we talking about here? The original, or the reamake with the boy in a yellow Tshirt? I saw the recent one and the beginning…
[ QUOTE ] That seems to be a trend nowadays though, movies about people being awkward in relationships, or feeling alienated...lots of sitting in rooms where no one is talking and whatever they are fidgeting with is REALLY LOUD. [/ QUOTE ] I agree it's getting to be a cliche but one movie I thought did this really well was…