Search
-
Polycount Image Hosting Service?
It seems like a lot of you guys don't have any sort of online storage at all. I see lots of images being posted using free image hosts like ImageShack and PutFile and such, and I also see lots of broken links as those files expire. It also seems that lots of you also primarily used your cottages for image hosting, and it… -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
Well, it can't be free, since bandwidth costs money. Either you're paying that money directly, or you're looking at (and subjecting other people to) ads. If you like ads, and like making other people look at ads to see your work, that's your choice. But I don't. So what's the balance between cost and bandwidth? What about… -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
I'd take one without a doubt. Sounds like a good deal, a buck a month is nothing really, the service would be from somewhere I trust, and I'd be supporting something I like. If you do it, I'm in. [edit]At the same, time, for that much space/transfer, couldn't we also be allowed to upload webpages?[/edit] -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
If it's pretty reliable, not coming down or running out of bandwidth all the time, I'd definitly be up for it. -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
Perhaps a shared one for the folk that need it? To use it, you donate 1-2 of your US dollars via paypal, and thats valid for a year? Most will need no more than 20 meg or so anyway. -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
I personally wouldn't, with Photobucket around. Besides, $1/month pays for a full web hosting service where I'm from. -
Re: Polycount Image Hosting Service?
If I can run a warez fileserver on it, sure But to be honest, a free version with only little space (5-10MB) would probably make more sense.
7 results