[ QUOTE ] news.bbc.co.uk: 9.5 (still got hit by the disabled part though) [/ QUOTE ] LOL, that is great. If that was a California law and it was a US news based site there would already be a lawsuit.
Marketing 7.6 Design 7.8 Accessibility 7.8 Experience 6.0 Overall 6.9 Ah well let down by the overall experience Apparently my website is ranked 611 in the world.
This is cool: http://www.silktide.com/ This is an automatic website quality testing application. It rates Marketing (How well marketed, and popular the website is), Design (How well designed and built the website is), Accessibility (How accessible the website is, particularly to those with disabilities), and Experience…
Got bored and threw them the major/popular news sites just to see what they thought: drudgereport.com: 7.6 ABCnews.com: 7.6 CBSnews.com: 7.8 news.google.com: 8.0 Foxnews.com: 8.2 CNN.com: 8.6 news.bbc.co.uk: 9.5 (still got hit by the disabled part though) The quick and dirty page for my program managed to get this:…
Ahh Rick, I was hoping you would show up I don't wanna derail the thread, but are you in the mood to answer a few more questions? Just in case... I have a visitor counter that rolled over at 9999 and was at 86 this morning. I emailed techsupport and they corrected it, but also told me this.... Also please be aware that you…
Although it makes little sense for portfolio sites: Marketing: 5.4 Design: 9.9 Accessibility: 5.6 Experience: 9.7 Overall: 6.8 I am apparently teh design w1nz0r! I got a 9.7 for "How satisfying the website is likely to be" even though half my page-links are placeholders looping back to the home page? It ranked chronically…
My website got these scores: Marketing: 7.2 Design: 6.5 Accessibility: 8.6 Experience: 5.1 Overall: 6.6 I think their algorythms are a little off though. Their biggest complaints is that some of my pages are all text, and that there are not enough images. However all but a few of my pages are completely images, so I think…