thought I'd run hotmail.com through it: Marketing 9.3 Design 4.6 Accessibility 5.6 Experience 4.0 This website is exceptionally popular (approx #2 in the world) As for it not understanding my w3c code, well they changed all that code stuff over xhtml now... which I can't be bothered to understand just yet.
gerrr, i guess it didnt like me... Marketing: 3.9 Design: 8.3 Accessibility: 5.6 Experience: 6.4 Overall: 5.5 basicly, no one knows about me, my code is outdated, and i still use tables not CSS.
The illegal stuff is based on British disability law and applies to SERVIES. So if you are running an online shop or a government help page, then you need to make sure it follows the guidelines. But you know what? The guidelines are so easy to implement anyway. Basically you need to use CSS, so that you can say…
Marketing: 7.6 Design: 8.1 Accessibility: 7.8 Experience: 8.3 Overall: 7.4 Aside from any 'technical' errors, it's subjective bollax. It doesn't appear to pick up on php or asp linked to scripts which is *very* odd. It told me that I don't have *any* intereactivity on my site when in fact visitors can post comments on news…
Marketing 6.7 Design 5.6 Accessibility 9.3 Experience 6.1 Visitor rating Warning This website cannot be voted for technical reasons. No votes Overall 6.6 The warning comes from the stupid javascript ads the host puts in there, as do most complaints about poor design (No CSS? WTF?) that make any sense (Forms???…