This is what i mean with we go in circles. The photoshop analogy fits perfectly. And the false accusation of Ai being an art thief remains a false accusation. Again, the AI is in the wild for months, and we haven't seen a single lawsuit so far. Since there is simply no license breach.
We go in circles. Since of course i disagree. Copyright is not broken by looking at public available images. Oh boy would we have a problem when this would be the case :) Have a read here: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/technology/copilot-microsoft-ai-lawsuit.html To the surprise of many legal experts, Mr. Butterick’s…
This does not work. Since you can train the AI with these images anyways. And the dataset is free available content of the internet. Nobody would ever think of limiting Photoshop to draw just vertical lines. Why do you want to do this with AI? It always boils down that you want to regulate the tool and all its users…
At the end of the day, all it takes to understand the infringement aspect of it (which, with a little bit of perspective gained over the last few weeks, is actually clear as day) is to replace the anthropomorphic term "learning" by the much more straightforward term "using". It could be rather easily demonstrated by simply…
You nailed it. I will not throw common sense and facts overboard just because some hateraging luddies wants me to. When they want to hate me for my view at the matter, shall they. The discussion is over anyways. We have gone in more than one full circle now. I have nothing more to say to the matter here. Tough one.…
I don't think that i mix up things by pointing at the facts. This "AI Jerk" could have also done this with photoshop and a filter. But yet you abuse this false example to discredit AI, and furthermore to discredit all AI users as jerks. And this is how you should not discuss. I can just repeat, hate Ai, but hate it for a…
@Tiles I get that you like AI, but every single one of your posts in this thread are just you saying "false claim" without giving a good reason why it's a false claim, and ignoring all the thoughtful stuff between the "false claims". This WHOLE thread basically amounts to: AI uses art made by artists to build its database;…
"Again, this is false claim. AI does not store art in its files or databases. It learns from the files. LAION does not ship with AI. It's the training data. And the training data is collected legally." I didn't say it stores art in its files or databases, nor did I say it was illegal; I said "AI uses art made by artists to…
@Tiles Okay. Noting this is a game art forum, I think it's safe to assume a large majority of the members in the discussion here understand that Photoshop, Maya, Zbrush, etc. are graphics software. I think what's central to the topic is the impact of AI's standout feature of rapidly converting text prompts into images.…