"if they are using materials from living artists, those living artists should be compensated automatically with every "generated" material no matter how small of a % if a lot of people using their thieving scripts then that % adds up" Hell no. Accepting such a deal would mean accepting the theft in the first place. That's…
all the law is threat of violence, and almost exclusively it is used to protect the owning class, not the working class. Wow. Just wow. I have stopped reading at that point already. Whatever you say my friend, whatever you say. And we don't have AI for music yet, right? Of course we have, since eons. Also here no lawsuit…
Really? The old models probably all backed up to hell. Same for all the embeddings. Which is why I feel the original researchers in LAION5B are incredibly irresponsible. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33953891 Glad there are at least two users on there who realize how ethically ambiguous it is. There's already CC0…
how can you search the database and find your medical information in form of pictures, if the pictures arent stored? How can you paint a picture if the image isn't stored in your brain? It both has the same answer. You learned the concept. This is what AI makes so fascinating. It learned what grass is, what a face is, and…
Whatever their attempts or solutions they seem to care about money so go after their profits and that is how this situation gets corrected quickly, if some "gov" is attempting to "hear" "the people", then voice that, if they are using materials from living artists, those living artists should be compensated automatically…
Wrong straw man. Napster provided copyrighted material. It was illegal from the beginning. They just thought they come through with it. And your hurt feelings doesn't matter for the law. Fact is, there is no law and no existing copyright broken by AI. Proof: the AI is in the wild for months, and not a single lawsuit has…
Does anybody use anything AI in actual game content production currently? I just wonder because I am trying for quite a while. Ai textures >> total crap. Except very limited number of subjects in Sampler maybe and I still prefer Substance Designer nevertheless . Ai models are a polygon mess . AI lods , no much of a…
i think greater technology will increase the gap of inequality, both economically and intellectually. for people who already have some means, it can help them increase their means. for people without, it takes away some options they had. I think it will increase demand for something like UBI or a bloody revolution. With…
We go in circles. Since of course i disagree. Copyright is not broken by looking at public available images. Oh boy would we have a problem when this would be the case :) Have a read here: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/technology/copilot-microsoft-ai-lawsuit.html To the surprise of many legal experts, Mr. Butterick’s…