Inpaint will not fix lack of knowledge. It won't let you fix perspective or composition or anything bigger. If you don't know what you are doing, ai tools wont either.
@ModBlue The majority of human art has always been generic or of low quality. The problem is that AI images can be generated in seconds and have high quality (colors, composition etc). Arguably much higher quality than those mediocre human artworks. As such they trend on Pinterest etc, while those human artworks did not.…
Some art.. indeed lacks some craftmanship.. but still someone may find it appealing.. up to the scribblings of someones own children.. :wink: ..so also some "pieces of a.." may find someone who want to pay for it.. So the special use of AI in generating images increases the occurence of "general art products" which was…
This is hardly a good comparison. The decent thing to do is to credit the asset maker, list what you used and most importantly, pay for the asset. Just like you paid for all the software in your pipeline. The artist also makes a choice of the assets to purchase. Amongst numerous other decisions, scene layout, converting…
Actually in architecture, the people doing it call themselves designers or visualizers, maybe that term is more appropriate with AI art prompters? Or you could say they are the lowest form of menial labor in art generation, kind of like trash pickers that work in the dumps foraging through garbage looking for recycling.…