Why did you take the video down? I'm sorry you feel attacked here, that is not my intent. I do think ethics are one of the main issues with the diffusion image generators, so yes, people will call others out on a perceived lack of ethics. And when someone is accused of ethical lapses, they should feel free to refute it, as…
Oh by the way : there have been many talks about how artists would have much preferred to have been asked for consent beforehand to allow their work to be fed into a rogue AI training model. Of course it's too late for that now as models have been heavily trained on ArtStation content and famous artists already. From there…
Yes, i play the devils advocate here, to some degree. Sorry ^^ ... obvious unethical nature of a training model ... It is in the same way ethical and legal than a robot replacing a worker in a factory. In the end the ethic question doesn't even matter. It is about if it is legal. And about if you are still be able to…
"AI does not use images" and yet above we have near-exact (down to the individual loose hairs hanging down over her forehead) recreations of that famous National Geographic photo down to most details. So how does that happen, if it "doesn't use images"? — images are data; if data is used, the image is used. That's a false…