Search
-
Re: Procedural material library creation starting from real world
Evaluating both FF ad SD, they seems to have different strengths and weakness.Both have scripting capabilities (FF in LUA, SD in Python), both are node based, with a vast library of pre-made textures (free in case of FF).SD appear to be more streamlined in managing real world images to create materials, FF is probably more… -
Re: Procedural material library creation starting from real world
From what I have read and a bit tested with their trial, comes down to Filter Forge or Substance Designer. All the others (Quixel Mixer, Substance Alchemist, etc) are not scriptable nor node based. Dind't know if I miss some other app worth considering. Problem for FF is didn't play well with current Affinity Photo… -
Re: Procedural material library creation starting from real world
One of the major advantages of designer is it's place as a pipeline management tool - this is overlooked by most small operations as its just not that important to them but if you're proposing to build a massive library it may well be a consideration. Where designer's weaknesses lie are that you cannot develop your own…
3 results