Everyone disagree but i'm wondering why.... His points are valid.... and no one is telling why he is wrong.... If someone create contents out of someone else content?
Sounds an awful lot like censorship. You shouldn't be able to cherrypick who pays and who doesn't based on the content of a video. Again, they are creating the content of the videos themselves. I watch a similar channel, Game Grumps, because I find them funny and enjoy watching them play games. Its not about circumventing…
The closest equivalent movies would have to Let's Plays is MST3K, which as far as I know had to secure rights to all the content they showed. He has an interesting point but I don't think he'll get any traction for it. I think the developer/youtuber relationship is already very mutually beneficial. Youtubers get content…
its an interesting subject, im not sure if im for or against it, but my gut instinct is that phills right in some ways but in his usual fashion goes about it the wrong way. taking films as a close cousin to games, companies are generally pretty keen on NOT letting key plot or endings being all over youtube at least when…
There is some point I do consider this conversation worth having, but if you are lets playing or reviewing the game in any way, or playing a game that is completely about being played competitively (League, Dota, Starcraft), the player making the content deserves all of the money. Also if you are a personality that is…
Sort of interesting topic. Its clearly not the same as movies/tv. Movies are a static medium that everyone experiences in the same way. If you stream a movie on the internet, you get the same experience as watching it on DVD or seeing in the theatre (give or take the amount/type of snacks and seating, and to some degree…